More cards in this set

Card 16

Front

‘Cost of Cure’ or ‘Diminution in Value’?

Back

Preview of the front of card 16

Card 17

Front

the amount going to be spent

Back

Preview of the front of card 17

Card 18

Front

Loss of a Chance Chaplin v Hicks 1911

Back

Preview of the front of card 18

Card 19

Front

The Reliance or Status Quo Ante Measure: Anglia TV v Reed 1972

Back

Preview of the front of card 19

Card 20

Front

by, the breach of contract.

Back

Preview of the front of card 20

Card 21

Front

STAGE TWO Limiting Factors Remoteness: The Problem- British Columbia Saw-Mill Co Ltd v Nettleship [1868] LR 3CP 499 at 508

Back

Preview of the front of card 21

Card 22

Front

Hadley v Baxendale (1854) most famous case in the common law of contract

Back

Preview of the front of card 22

Card 23

Front

What was the question that arose?

Back

Preview of the front of card 23

Card 24

Front

Why is Hadley famous? The Hadley Rules

Back

Preview of the front of card 24

Card 25

Front

[2] as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties, at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach of it [i.e. damages for unusual losses].’ Alderson B in Hadley v. Baxendale 1854

Back

Preview of the front of card 25
View more cards