Banker and customer relationship

?
  • Created by: lawliv
  • Created on: 29-05-17 16:07
L S P U L F W G W K K W B D R P I U N O X
L B Y X V R O L I N V S T E W A R D O X A
I A K I R I D L L A W F M Y O V L E X L E
R R E J I Q O X L B S S A Q Q L L G M B C
W C V A V E O M I S L F R J G H O P T L Y
E L H C M U W F A Y M Y Z X B S Y U I I K
C A I K Y A N W M A O C E O R Y D R S T G
R Y B S T T E H S L K N T H J W S R B T N
Y S E O M R E Q V C Y C T Y G Y B H R Y R
N B R N V L R G S R X I I I N V A B V X G
L A I V X G G X U A M Y V S D U N Y E U V
T N A R M D V I M B T F W X H U K N D Y Q
E K N B X D G N M V Q U I N Q U V E A Q J
J V B S G V N M E T S M L G W I C X E A Y
K T A P X G I W R E C M L A V R O U R Y I
K A N V B E R F F G Q G I E A V B F Y S C
F Y K D F D Y X I G C E A Y J E B U U X W
Q L F V P G K D E I P A M A F X G W P M U
M O X P J T S E L L T J S J M V X X A V T
G R L A O Q O W D M M E L F J I T W W D Y
M S O O V C Q G Y E C M D M E E F U A W O

Clues

  • 'Refer to drawer' was capable of a defamatory meaning. (4, 1, 8, 4)
  • Bank has a duty of confidentiality in relation to information acquired in character of his banker. (8, 4, 1, 6)
  • Bank inadvertently disclosed it's customer's mark up, leading to loss of a line of business. Bank ordered to pay for the lost profit that the customer could prove had resulted. (7, 1, 3)
  • Customer gave an instruction to countermand a cheque with details of the cheque number and payee, but not the account no. The clerk made a note against one account, but not the other. Cheque paid. Countermand was effective, breach of duty. (5, 1, 3)
  • Customer made a deposit of £40 at 11am. At 3pm a cheque was dishonoured as the £40 had not yet been entered onto the ledger. Breach of duty to make payements. (8, 1, 8)
  • Disclosure orders were granted to the police when a company employee was accused of misappropriating company funds. (8, 1, 11)
  • In the context of a business customer, there is a presumption in the favour of the customer that he will suffer loss of reputation. (5, 1, 7)
  • Military office paid erroneously for 5 years. The erroneous entries amount to representations. Would be prejudicial to the customer to allow the bank to recover the amounts of mistaken payments. (7, 1, 9)
  • The bank exceeded its mandate when it honoured a cheque signed by one director when the mandate required two signatures. (6, 1, 8, 4)
  • To place the bank under a duty of care to the borrower regarding the viability of a business transaction, the borrower must make it clear to the bank that its advice is being sought. (6, 4, 1, 4)

Comments

mcpherson1031dst

Report

The Real Estate Exchange is a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) investment firm. Our platform provides access to the largest marketplace of DST investments from over 30 different sponsor companies. We review each DST investment to ensure that it's a legitimate option for our clients. Our client's personal goals are our number one priority. Delaware Statutory Trust (DST)

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Banking law resources »