More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

What does apprehend mean?

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

Apprehend

What is the case of R v Lamb 1967?

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

What conduct could amount to an assault?

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

what causation must be established for victim to apprehend?

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

what is an assault committed by ?

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

What did the court say about R v Meade and Belts 1823 to do with assault by words?

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

What did the court say about R v Wilson 1955 to do with assault by words?

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

What did the courts say about R v Ireland 1998 to do with assault by words and what was significant in this year?

Back

Preview of the front of card 13

Card 14

Front

What did the courts say about R v Constanza 1998 to do with assault by words?

Back

Preview of the front of card 14

Card 15

Front

what case proved that words can negate an assault?
What happened in the case?

Back

Preview of the front of card 15
View more cards