Skip to content
Get Revising
Search:
Keyword:
Go
Subject
Resource type:
Resource type (all)
Flashcards
Revision cards
Revision notes
Quizzes
Mindmaps
Crosswords
Organise your thinking
Quizsearches
Shared resources
Join
Join Get Revising
Start learning now
Already a member?
Please sign in
Email address
Password
Forgotten your password?
Remember my details
Log in
Create
GCSE
A Level & IB
University
Study planner
Past papers
For teachers
More cards in this set
Card 16
Front
The 'proviso'
Back
Card 17
Front
Lurking Doubt v Proviso- Proviso is used more freuqently, Lurking Doubt used rarely
Back
Card 18
Front
There were miscarriages of justice in 1970 and 1980s, e.g. Maguire seven, Birmingham six, Cardiff three, what had to change?
Back
Card 19
Front
Government response- Criminal Appeal 1995 replaced above with new section 2, what does it read?
Back
Card 20
Front
What is the problem with this?
Back
Card 21
Front
Evolution of s.2
Back
Card 22
Front
men had to plead guilty to get lighter sentence. Then they tried to appeal bc illegal evidence. Should they be allowed to appeal?
Back
Card 23
Front
What does this suggest?
Back
Card 24
Front
R v Mullen [1999]
Back
Card 25
Front
He appeals to CA because even though he was guilty, he was brought to trial against protocol
Back
View more cards
