Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. Which two cases demonstrate that: types of damages that are not foreseeable, cannot be claimed for as they are too remote?
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council ... and ... Whitely v Chappell
- Roe v Minister of Health ... and ... Smith v Leech Brain and Co
- The Wagon Mound ... and ... Crossley v Rowlinson
- Smith v Leech Brain and Co... and ... Bolton v Stone
7. 'The defendant must take the claimant as he finds him' ... which rule / test does this definition best apply to?
- the JAC test
- eggshell skull rule
- neighbour principle
- but for test
8. The first duty of care was established in...?
- Pepper v Hart
- Caparo v Hart
- Donaghue v Stevenson
- Caparo v Dickman
9. There was NO duty of care owed in Bourhill v Young because...?
- The motor cyclist did not cause the crash
- Harm wasn't foreseeable as she was 50 yards away from the accident
- the type of injury (loss of her baby) was an unforeseeable
- the woman was responsible for the crash so nobody else owes her a duty of care
10. In Bolton v Stone, the cricket club weren't in breach of duty because...?
- The cricket ball caused a serious injury to the person it hit but they didn't sue as they were a massive fan of the game.
- There is a social benefit to playing cricket, and the ball hit a fellow cricket player who understood that playing the sport could lead to injury.
- There is a social benefit to playing cricket and the likelihood of the ball leaving the grounds and hitting someone was very low.
- The likelihood of the cricket ball leaving the ground was high but the social benefit of the sport outweighs this.