Anti-Money Laundering
- Created by: lawliv
- Created on: 30-05-17 12:54
S | U | F | T | H | K | J | X | L | E | I | S | O | P | M | W | R | R | H | Y | F |
C | E | I | A | U | A | U | X | V | D | U | H | M | N | O | Q | M | V | E | G | U |
I | S | K | R | S | K | R | S | P | M | L | A | Q | B | T | V | D | S | I | B | Y |
C | K | H | S | S | F | L | P | T | R | A | H | E | S | J | T | X | H | V | Q | W |
K | Y | W | D | E | L | Q | C | F | U | H | V | F | H | O | P | D | A | U | R | I |
O | R | O | M | I | D | C | V | N | B | M | H | M | D | S | P | Y | H | Y | Y | A |
B | L | E | Q | N | L | G | E | N | S | A | S | N | I | H | H | D | R | C | S | Q |
W | G | Q | X | V | L | K | R | F | H | D | B | B | D | J | N | S | U | N | H | R |
S | Q | M | S | C | A | S | A | L | A | V | C | S | A | D | N | R | P | S | P | X |
D | T | R | E | H | H | Q | D | V | N | H | P | T | O | H | X | O | U | H | O | F |
D | V | V | V | A | S | H | N | H | S | M | R | P | A | S | V | S | R | P | T | A |
W | G | S | U | N | R | G | E | Q | A | A | I | B | J | B | I | P | W | M | E | H |
O | M | A | Q | G | A | K | H | W | R | D | V | R | V | G | E | A | R | Y | S | K |
I | J | I | G | F | M | D | P | O | D | V | A | P | T | W | J | O | W | W | F | X |
X | U | K | D | O | V | J | E | Q | R | O | T | F | B | L | U | M | D | G | H | U |
X | H | M | V | O | E | E | T | T | E | C | E | S | Q | S | F | Y | W | X | M | F |
D | P | S | Q | K | P | G | S | X | P | A | B | U | Q | X | X | N | O | W | S | U |
A | G | U | U | K | T | P | S | S | O | T | A | H | A | W | C | C | S | I | Y | T |
M | V | L | M | A | B | T | J | E | R | E | N | S | Y | D | N | W | S | J | X | F |
S | W | G | N | M | W | K | N | U | T | J | K | M | H | G | W | P | Q | N | J | C |
A | F | T | C | C | G | C | S | F | F | O | X | O | J | P | G | F | C | F | C | B |
Clues
- 'An objective test is necessary because we want the financial industry at large to be must more diligent in identifying and reporting instances of money laundering. (7, 6)
- 'The boundary between a real but "vague sense of unease" and the thought that there is a "more than fanciful possibility" that a transaction might involve money laundering is easy to articulate but almost impossible to identify in practice.' (8)
- Bank refused to give information with regard to the freezing of customer's account. Court said that the bank does not have to say anything at all. (1, 1, 4)
- Lord Devlin - 'suspicion' related to a 'state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking'. (7, 1, 5, 4, 3)
- Must be reasonable grounds for the suspicion. (1, 1, 4)
- section 328 only applies to property which is criminal prior to the arrangement. (1, 1, 5)
- section 330(2) does not require that money laundering is actually taking place. (5, 1, 2, 8)
- The 'other' person had to be identified or at least identifiable at the moment of the arrangement. (7, 4, 1, 3)
- The burden is upon the reporting institution to prove suspicion, (4, 1, 4, 7, 4)
Comments
No comments have yet been made