Anonymous Witnesses

?
What is the common law position on anonymous witnesses?
Permitted (witnesses can give evidence under pseudonyms, identifying addresses/personal deets to be withheld, D counsel couldn't ask for any identifying info, witnesses could testify behind screens/their natural voices distorted)
1 of 7
Which case established this common law position?
Davis
2 of 7
What are the issues with allowing anonymous witnesses?
Compels D to take blind shots at a hidden target, D might be derived of showing witness is prejudiced/hostile/unreliable (Kostovski v Netherlands)
3 of 7
What did the ECtHR hold in Doorson v Netherlands?
Conviction can't be based solely/to a decisive extent on evidence of anonymous witnesses
4 of 7
Which provisions put Davis on a statutory footing?
S.86 onwards of CJA 2009
5 of 7
Why does a D have to tell more people of real identity of witness? (According to Sadar)
Perhaps because application by D is usually in a case involving co-Ds
6 of 7
Which case says that it is logical to begin with Condition C in s.88, and that a witness anonymity order is a special measure of last resort?
Mayers
7 of 7

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Which case established this common law position?

Back

Davis

Card 3

Front

What are the issues with allowing anonymous witnesses?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What did the ECtHR hold in Doorson v Netherlands?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Which provisions put Davis on a statutory footing?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal Procedure and Criminal Evidence resources »