6. Kicking someone in the head is likely to be viewed as?
s18 - GBH
s20-GBH
s47-ABH
7. which case defined a wound as a cut going through the layers of the skin?
Morrisson
DPP V Smith
EISENHOWER
Thomas
8. there is no need to prove harm or physical pain for battery cases
true
false
9. wouding or GBH with intent is trailled at?
supereme court
supreme court/crown court
magistrates/crown court
magistartes
10. actus reus of GBH=?
application of unlawful force from one person to another
unlwafully and maliciously inflicted 'really serious harm'
an assault or battery that leads to ABH
11. mens rea of abh=?
intention and/or recklessness as to the assault or battery
intention and/or recklessness to inflict some harm
intention
12. what type of offence case is R v Piff?
Wounding or GBH with intent
GBH
battery
ABH
13. Which of the following is not part of the actus reus of s47
ocassioning
GBH
assault
actual bodily harm
14. actus reus of assault=?
act that causes victim to apprehend immediate unlwaful personal violence
applicaion of unlwaful force form one person to another
intention and/or recklessness to the assault or battery
15. Df shouts at V and threatens to beat her up at the end of the day. V doesn't like Df and is looking forward to a fight. This is not an assault because ...
the threat is not of immediate violence
victim is not scared
there's no injury
16. the actus reus for s20 and s18 is the same
true
false
17. df stabs V intending serious harm - the knife punctures the lung and causes serious injuries. is this ...
