Back to quiz

6. how was this study carried out

  • using 8 sane men and women who changed their names and jobs, nothing else. Sought entrance into a mental hospital by 'hearing voices'. Once in they stopped acting and said they were fine.
  • using 8 schizophrenic men in a mental hospital, all asked to observe the conditions and treatments in the hospital
  • using 6 sane women who changed their entire history, sought entrance into a mental hospital by claiming depression. Once there they stopped acting and said they were fine.

7. deviating from social norms means

  • annoying other people when they've asked you not to
  • breaking the unwritten rules society has created to govern the way we behave
  • breaking laws of how to behave in public

8. two strengths of the biological approach

  • determinist and can be applied to every illness
  • determinist (patient doesn't feel at fault) and treats psychology as a science (can be tested for reliability)
  • reductionist and treats psychology as a science (can be tested for reliability)

9. three weaknesses

  • reductionist, can't establish cause and effect, not good for all illnnesses
  • no evidence, reductionist, not good for all illnesses
  • not good for all illnesses, can't establish cause and effect, research only on animals

10. two pieces of evidence for the idea of infections causing abnormality

  • Barr et al, who suggested that flu during pregnancy meant schizophrenia was more likely, and general paresis (causes illusions of grandeur) being caused by the disease syphilis
  • Barr et al, who suggested that flu during pregnancy meant schizophrenia was more likely, Hollands who looked at a link between depression and malaria
  • General paresis (causes illusions of grandeur) being caused by the disease syphilis, and Barr et al, who suggested that malaria was linked with depression

11. what were Jahoda's six criteria for this

  • confident, environmental mastery, control of anger, resistance to stress, intelligence, accurate perception of reality
  • autonomy, high self esteem, self actualisation, environmental mastery, resistance to stress, accurate perception of reality
  • accurate perception of reality, high self esteem, patient, autonomy, intelligent, self actualisation

12. What are the seven criteria Rosenhan and Seligman created for defining failure to function adequately

  • personal distress, maladaptive, unpredictability, irrationality, statistical rarity, violation of moral and ideal standards, observer discomfort
  • personal distress, observer discomfort, harmful, statistical rarity, impatient, unpredictability, maladaptive
  • maladaptive, quick to anger, irrationality, poor hygiene, observer discomfort, personal distress, statistical rarity

13. 3 more weaknesses

  • reductionist, norms may not be morally right, culturally biased
  • culturally biased, norms may not be morally right, hard to decide whether eccentric or abnormal
  • culturally biased, determinist, takes a lot of time

14. two weaknesses

  • context must be considered, norms can change over time
  • has ecological validity, context must be considered
  • norms can change over time, isn't practical

15. two pieces of evidence of the idea of genes causing abnormalities

  • relatives of schizophrenics being 18 times more likely to develop schizophrenia and Hollands, who looked at anorexia in 100% identical and 50% identical twins. 100% had a 56% chance of both having anorexia, 50% was only 6% chance.
  • relatives of schizophrenics being 10 times more likely to develop schizophrenia and Barr et al, who thought that there was a 70% chance of 100% identical twins having depression
  • Hollands, who looked at anorexia in 100% identical and 50% identical twins. 100% had a 86% chance of both having anorexia, 50% was only 1% chance and relatives of schizophrenics being 10 times more likely to develop schizophrenia

16. What was the aim of Rosenhan's 'being sane in insane places' study

  • to investigate the problems with defining abnormalities
  • to investigate the treatment of abnormal people
  • to investigate whether or not it was possible to fake a mental illness

17. what does the biochemistry idea assume

  • some chemicals in the body are damaging to behaviour, which must be dealt with by drugs
  • abnormality is due to chemical imbalances in the body, too little or too much neurotransmitter in the synapse is a problem.
  • chemicals in the brain can change wildly, causing abnormality

18. two strengths of this theory

  • irrationality can show the people really in need of help, isn't subjective
  • statistical rarity and violation of moral and ideal standards make it practical to identify those needing help, takes the individual's personal distress into account
  • takes the individual's personal distress into account, isn't subjective

19. what does failure to function adequately believe

  • behaviour is abnormal if people around you don't like what you are doing and feel uncomfortable
  • behaviour is abnormal if it is maladaptive (hinders our survival)
  • behaviour is abnormal if it makes us fail at tests

20. what are the key assumptions of the biological approach

  • we are not sure what causes abnormality but it is thought to come from the brain and chemical inbalances
  • abnormality has a physical cause, which should be treated medically. It is determinist and takes all blame away from the patient
  • abnormality is a disease, which should be treated medically. It is the patient's fault for not looking after their health.