Tort

NEGLIGENCE

DUTY OF CARE

Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 = Neighbour principle - Must take reaosnable care to avoid acts that may injure your nieghbour

Caparo v Dickman 1990 = 3 part test:

1) Reasonably forseeable?

2) Sufficiently proximate relationship?

3) Fair, just and reasonable?

REASONABLY FORSEEABLE:

- Depends on facts of case

Kent v Griffiths 2000 - Ambulance late arriving and didnt have reaonsable excuse. V died. V wouldnt have died if ambulance arrived on time. Was reaosnably forseeable

PROXIMITY:

Osman v Ferguson 1993…