Reicher and Haslam
- Created by: Caroline Weiner
- Created on: 27-05-13 15:09
Fullscreen
AIMS:
- to conduct prison experiment wihtout ethical issues (Stanford Prison Experiment)
- look at conditions that lead individuals to identift with a group and accept/challenge group inequalities
- examine the role of social, organisational and clincal factors in group behaviour
METHOD:
- lab experiment over 10 days
- BBC created prison environment, all videod
- ethics: 2 clinical psychologists, 5 ethics committee, paramedic on scene, independent security guards
PARTICIPANTS:
- 15 men (prisoners and guards)
- advertised in national press - 332 -> 25 after 3 screening phases
- psychometric testing, full weekend assessment, character/medical references and police checks
- only well adjusted/pro-social people included
- diversity of age, class, ethnic background
- personality matched to groups of 3 - one randomly allocated guard
DESIGN:
- Repeated measures
- Time series approach
PROCEDURE:
- Initiation for guards: shown timetable, 'ensure insitution ran smoothly', asked to draw up rules/punishments lists, given uniforms,
- Initiation for prisoners: arrived on at a time, heads shaven, given uniform, only given list of rules, rights and told there was possibility of promotion
- Day 3 - Permiability: At beginning all told guard selection was due to reliability/trustworthiness, told movement between groups was possible but on Day 3 told CHANGE WAS NOT POSSIBLE
- Day 6 - Legimitacy of group situations: 3 days after ONE PROMOTION took place told there were actually no differences but it would be impractical to change groups (Random allocation)
- Day 7 - Possibility of change: New prisoner (trade union official) - expected that he would introduce plan of action, organise to have more equality
DATA COLLECTION:
- Observation - visually/audibly recorded throughout
- Daily psychometric testing - questionnaire - adressed social, organisational and clinical factors e.g. identifcation with group
- Daily saliva swabs - cortisol levels - stess - to look at their wellbeing
RESULTS:
- prisoners behaved as expected - working hard at first (possibility of promotion)
- after promotion eliminated prisoners began to…
Comments
No comments have yet been made