Psychology Research Methods

?

Research methods notes

Research method

Description

Strengths

Limitations

Experimental methods

 

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTb9pTS8QM6Ji_ScLgUkGBU-cnfwbZWr8pGO-36HZ_2bF2tMXoyoA:www.gerardkeegan.co.uk/resource/exp_rat.jpg

A research method which enables a researcher to manipulate the situation a person is in and see what effect it has on a person in order to test a theory to see if it’s correct. There are 3 types: laboratory, field and quasi.

<strong>      Offer a high level of control over extraneous variables which makes it easier to reliably establish a cause and effect

</strong>      If cause and effect is established it is possible to predict and control behaviour making them highly scientific.

<strong>      They’re objective because they are not easily influenced by the experimenter once set up therefore results are not bias.

</strong>      Most are laboratory based meaning the environment is artificial, therefore findings lack ecological validity.

<strong>      They are highly controlled and measure variables in precise ways which gives results that lack construct validity as they are assed more narrowly than they would be in real life.

</strong>      Participants are aware they are taking part in experiments therefore they may respond to the demand characteristics differently than normal.

Methods of self-report

 

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQuKajwt4WrCGnrbzNPj0NwuMVUSDYQH_8p6s7LOCgMihhzwCTJfA:sgspsychology2.webs.com/questionnaire.jpg

This is when the participant explains their views/ideas themselves, without the manipulation of variables. There are 3 key methods: questionnaires, structured interviews and unstructured interviews.

<strong>      Unlike observations, it is possible to access people’s thoughts and feelings through asking questions

</strong>      Questions allow researchers to find out what people would do in certain situations without having to set them up.

<strong>      Methods of questioning need participants to possess a number of qualities to be reliable. They can be ineffective if participants are dishonest, in articulate, lack confidence, lack insight or have poor memory

</strong>      It is possible that participants’ responses are influenced by researchers when using interviews or questionnaires. They may feel pressured to give socially desirable responses.

Observational studies

 

 

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLB5P_kpmBGvln3ZTr4g4qB3ScI2IlMwkXmb8C14oo-o-TlpVf:www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/assets/learn_its/alevel/sociology/methods/participant-observation/2008-01-29_133545.gif

These involve watching and recording people’s behaviour. This can be done in a number of ways including video recording and using a check list of criteria.

<strong>      Findings from observations are more reliable as the researchers can see for themselves how participants behave rather than relying on self-reports.

</strong>      Most observations take place in a natural setting so have high ecological validity

<strong>      It is difficult to make judgements about thoughts and feelings when using this method as these features are not clearly observable.

</strong>      Observer bias can be a problem as the researcher may only perceive things from a certain perspective.

<strong>      If participants are aware they are being observed then they may act differently giving invalid results: this is known as observer effect.

Correlation studies

http://scienceaid.co.uk/psychology/approaches/images/correlation.jpg

These describe a process rather than an actual method. Correlation studies use methods such as self-report or an observation to collect data but it is how data is analysed which is important.

</strong>      Correlations can establish the strength and direction of the relationship between variables.

<strong>      They allow researchers to statistically analyse naturally occurring phenomenon which could not be set up ethically or practically.

</strong>      They…

Comments

No comments have yet been made