Topic 5 - The functionalist perspective on education

?

Durkheim - Social solidarity

D - society needs sense of solidarity - individual members must feel part of single community. Argues w/o social solidarity, social life + cooperation impossible b/c each individual would pursue own selfish desires.

Ed sys helps create social solidarity - transmits society's culture from one gen to next. Eg D argues teaching of country's history instils sense of shared heritage + commitment to wider social group.

School - 'society in miniature' - prepares for life in wider society. Eg in school + work have to cooperate w/ people who neither family/friends - teachers + pupils at school, colleagues + customers at work. Have to interact w/ others according to set of impersonal rules apply to everyone.

1 of 5

Durkheim - Specialist skills

Modern industrial economies - complex DOL - production of single item involves cooperation of many diff specialists. 

Cooperation promotes solidarity but to be successful, each person must have necessary specialist knowledge + skills to perform their role. 

D argues ed teahes specialist knowledge + skills needed to play part in social DOV.

2 of 5

Parsons - Meritocracy

Sees school as 'focal socialising agency' in modern society - acts as bridge b/ween family + wider society. Needed b/c operate on diff principles, so children need to learn new way of living if to cope w/ wider world.

W/in family, child judged by particularistic standards + status ascribed. Both school + wider society, judged by universalistic + impersonal standards, status achieved.

P sees school as preparing us to move from family -> wider society b/c both based on meritocratic principles. In meritocracy, everyone given equal opp + individuals achieve rewards through own effort + ability.

3 of 5

Davis + Moore - role allocation

D + M (1945) - see ed as device for selection + role allocation. Focus on selection + social inequality. Argue inequality necessary to ensure most important roles filled by most talented. Most efficient way to run society. Encourage everyoe to compete to work for this - society selcts most talented.

Ed key part in process - proving ground for ability. Where individuals show what they can do. 'Sifts + sorts' according to ability. Most able gain highest qualifications. Most able gain highest qualifications, gives entry to most important positions.

Human capital - Blau + Duncan (1978) - argue modern economy depends for prosperity on using 'human capital' - workers' skils. Argue meritocratic ed sys does this best as enables each to be allocated to job best suited to abilities. Makes most effective use of talents, maximises productivity.

4 of 5

Evaluation of functionalist perspective

Ed sys doesn't teach specialised skills adequately (D claims it does). Wolf review of vocational ed (2011) - high-quality apprenticeships rare + up to 1/3 16-19 y/os on courses that don't -> higher ed or good jobs.

Lots of evidence thay equal opp in ed doesn't exits - eg gender, class background, ethnicity etc.

Interactionist, Wrong (1961) - functionalists have 'over-socialised view' of people as mere puppets in society. F's wrongly imply pupils passively accept all they're taught + never reject school's values.

Marxists argue ed capitalist society.

Tumin (1953) criticises D + M for putting forward circular argument - eg how do we know a job is important? Because it's highly rewarded. How do we know it's highly rewarded? Because it's important.

5 of 5

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »