"The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being and under the Queen's peace, with malice aforethought, express or implied the death following within 3 years."
2 of 18
Causation in Fact
What test is used to show the defendant is guilty of causation in fact & case?
3 of 18
Causation in Fact
The 'but for' test is used.
Case: R v. Pagett
4 of 18
Causation in Law
What is the two-part test used to causation in law to prove the defendant is guilty?
5 of 18
Causation in Law
(i) was the defendants act more than a minimal cause.
(ii) was there a new intervening act/event which broke the chain of causation.
6 of 18
Causation In Law
Relevent cases that go along for the two-part test, for causation in law?
7 of 18
Causation in Law
R v. Smith
R v. Blaue
R v. Holland
8 of 18
Mens Rea
What does the phrase Malice Aforethought Express mean?
9 of 18
Mens Rea
The intention to kill!
10 of 18
Mens Rea
What does the phrase Malice Aforethought Implied mean?
11 of 18
Mens Rea
The intention to cause GBH.
12 of 18
Mens Rea
In which case was it made clear that an intention to cause GBH was sufficient to the mens rea?
13 of 18
Mens Rea
R v. Vickers
14 of 18
Intention
How do you know when the intention of the mens rea is direct?
15 of 18
Intention
Direct is simple, it's where its obvious from the facts the defendant intended the end result.
16 of 18
Intention
Name two cases that go along wth indirect intention.
Comments
Report