KEY STUDIES
- Created by: gcserh12
- Created on: 19-05-14 10:37
Rahe (1970)
Aim: To investigate whether scores on the SRRS correlate with the subsequent onset of illness.
Method: - 2,500 male American sailors
- interviewed about number of life events experienced in last 6 months
- SRRS score worked out
- over next 6 months detailed records of health kept
Findings: - positive correlation of 0.1
- there is a relationship
Evaluation: - does not show cause and effect
- sample bias/ lacks population validity/ sailors possibly hardy
- Zur (2007) - meaning of the event is important e.g. reason for loss of spouse
Kiecolt-Glaser (1984)
Aim: To investigate whether stress causes a reductionin the effectiveness of the immune system
Method: - 75 first year medical students
- natural experiment
- filled in questionnaire looking at loneliness,life events, depression
- blood test 1 month before exam and during the exam
- level of T-cells measured
Findings: - significant decrease in number of T-cells during exam
- particularly low for students who reported feeling lonely
Evaluation: - lacks population validity
- questionaire=social desirability bias
+ Research support = Riley (1981)
+/- natural experiment - high ecological validity but no control over extraneous variables
Bouteyre (2007)
- Studied first year psychology students at a French University
- They completed the HSUP scale and a questionnaire measuring depression
- There was a positive correlation
- Daily Hassles associated with starting university could contribute to depression
Gervais (2005)
- Asked nurses to keep diaries for a month recording all hassles and uplifts
- Asked to rate their performance over same period
- Found daily hassles increase job strain and decreased performance
- Uplifts had the opposite effect
Johansson (1978)
Aim: To investigate whether work stressors (repetitiveness, machine-regulated pacce, high responsibility) increase stress related illness
Method: - High risk group = 14 finishers, low risk group = 10 cleaners
- Swedish sawmill
- levels of stress-related hormones in urine measured on work and rest days
- records kept of illness and absenteeism
Findings: - high risk group secreted more stress hormones on work days than rest daysand hgiher levels than low risk group
- high risk group showed significantly higher levels of absenteeism than the low risk group
Evaluation: - doesn't show cause and effect
- lacks population validity
+ use of quantitive data - more accurate
- Marmot (1997) - no link between workload and stress but there was for control
Friedman & Rosenman (1974)
Aim: To test their belief that Type A personalities were more prone to CHD than Type B
Method: - longitudinal sstudy
- Over 3,00 male volunteers from California between 39 and 59
- personality type established through structured interview
Findings: - 81/2 years later, 70% of the men diagnosed with CHD were Type A
- Type A had higher levels of adrenaline and cholestrol
- Twice as many Type A had died compared to Type B
- Type As more likely to smoke
Evaluation: - opportunity sample - not representative sample
- lack population validity
- other factors contributing to CHD e.g. smoking
Asch (1956)
Aim: To explore how and why individuals are influenced by a larger group to behave in a certain way
Method: - 123 American male undergraduates
- 1 participant in each group of confederates
- 2 cards - 1 standard line, 3 of differing lines
- asked to match the 2 most similar lines
- participant always answered last or next to last
Finding: - 37% of answers given by participants were incorrect
- 75% conformed at least once
Evaluation: + support from Sherif (1935)
- child of its time - McCarthyism, Perrin and Spencer 1 person conformed
- Ethics: Deception and lack of informed consent
- lacks population and ecological validity
Milgram (1963)
Aim: To investigate what level of obedience would be shown when patricipants wwere told by an authority figure to give an electric shock to another person
Method: - 40 males aged 20 - 50 years of age obtained through newspaper ad
- had shock generator - 30 switches (15 to 450V)
- participant= teacher, confederate= learner
- learner strapped to electric chair and asked questions by teacher
- incorrect answer = shock
Findings: - All 400 participants obeyed up to 300V
- 65% shocked up to 450V
Evaluation: - Baumrind (1964) - participants put under excessive emotional stress
- Ethics - deception and lack of informed consent
Hofling (1966)
- Asked 22 nurses to give 20mg of Astrogen over the phone
- Nurses did not know doctor
- This was double the recommended dose
- Astrogen was actually glucose
- 21 out of 22 nurses gave the full dose
Moscovici (1969)
Aim: To support the view that a minority are most likely to influence a majority if they are consistent
Method: - 32 groups of six females (4 participants, 2 confederates)
- first given eye test
- shown 36 slides of different shades of blue
- 3 groups: consistent confederates (green every time), inconsistent confederates ( answered green 24 times, control group (no green)
Findings:- control group= 0.25% answered green
- inconsistent group = 1.25% answered green
- consistent group = 8.42% answered green
Evaluation: - Ethics - deception and lack of informed consent
- sample bias/lacks population validity - only females used
- lacks ecological validity - lab experiment
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Key lessons from Assessment Centres (Network Rail, PwC, Arup) »
- How do I actually revise for yr10 mocks 💔 »
- Romeo and Juliet HELP »
- I am considering A-Level Politics »
- Helpp »
- 2 weeks enough revision for Media Studies? »
- Nursing »
- Ace your exams without stress »
- why am I stressing over notes »
- What are some common challenges A-level students face, how overcome? »
Comments
No comments have yet been made