Conclusions reached by inductive arguments are contingent – their reliability is questionable.
Hume said that there is no reason why the future should resemble the past, so making generalisations based on past experience is not particularly reliable.
Inductive arguments increase the probability of the conclusion, but are still not certain.
So, while the premises of the raven argument increase the probability of the truth of the conclusion, the conclusion is contingent - it could be either true or false.
Comments
No comments have yet been made