Teleological Argument

HideShow resource information
View mindmap
  • Teleological Argument
    • William Paley
      • Design Qua purpose
      • Design Qua Regularity
        • The is evidence of a designer due to apparent order in the world
        • The relationships between things in the world is so precise e.g Earth's atmosphere (Goldilocks belt) that it is irrational to assume there is not an intelligent designer behind it's creation
          • The is evidence of a designer due to apparent order in the world
    • Criticisms
      • Hume
        • Using Paley's logic, why is it not possible to consider multiple, lesser designers-coincides with Paganism at the time before Darwin
        • To speak of God as a designer is to put Him into a  superhuman and anthropomorphic sense which does not correlate to the idea of perfection
          • He does however agree that great design does imply a great designer
            • But our world is full of animals and nature that are "insufficient all of them for their own happiness"
              • Our God is therefore vindictive and cruel
                • J.S Mill: "Either there is no God or there exists and incompetent or immoral God"
      • Darwin
        • This regularity seen in the world and purpose in everything is down to evolution and billions of years of natural selection until everything looked so perfect it appears ordered.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Philosophy resources:

See all Philosophy resources »See all Ideas of gods resources »