Party Decline vs Party Renewal Theory

?
View mindmap
  • Party Decline          vs           Party Renewal Thesis
    • Party Decline Thesis
      • "The Party's over" by David Broder argues for the Party Delcine Theory
      • Nomination
        • Now is carried out mostly by the public not the party in primaries
          • For example the Iowa primary 2016 which voted in favour of Ted Cruz for the Republican Party and Hilary Clinton for the Democrats
          • Primaries lead to disunity among the parties as they don't work in a collegiate manner to elect a candidate
            • E.g reported Republican Party split over current candidacy according to the New York Times
        • Can select mavericks that upset the party
          • E.g Ron Paul who is never invited to the presidential debate because he is seen as too much of a maverick
      • Campaigning
        • Carried out by individual campaign teams not the party as a whole
          • E.g CREEP or Obama's team with campaign leader David Axelrod and the use of Sam Power
      • Fundraising
        • Most money for candidates now does not come from the party it comes from individuals
          • Obama raised $750m in 2008 from small donations and Bernie Sanders has raised nearly $95m in individual contributions (Feb 2016)
      • Communication
        • Role of media has taken away the power of the parties
          • Obama spent $288 million on 504,623 ads (to end of Oct), 82% spent on negative ads. 
    • Party Renewal Thesis
      • Superdelegates/ unpledged delegates
        • In 2008, 800 Democrat delegates were superdelegates (20 % of all delegates)
        • In 2000 nearly all superdelegates backed Bush helping him beat McCain to the candidacy
      • Legal rulings
        • Have strengthened the role of parties
        • For instance, US supreme court Cousins v Wigoda (1975) favoured national parties over regional ones
      • Pro-active leadership
        • Greater fundraising programmes and direct mail programmes
      • Soft Money
        • Money donated to the party in a way in which it cannot be regulated
        • Because soft money is not regulated by election laws, companies, unions and individuals may give donations in any amount to a political party for the purpose of "party building."
          • However since the McCain-Feingold act there has been a growing decline of soft money. For example the DNC has lost roughly $50m in soft money donations in the election after the act
            • Party Decline Thesis
              • "The Party's over" by David Broder argues for the Party Delcine Theory
              • Nomination
                • Now is carried out mostly by the public not the party in primaries
                  • For example the Iowa primary 2016 which voted in favour of Ted Cruz for the Republican Party and Hilary Clinton for the Democrats
                  • Primaries lead to disunity among the parties as they don't work in a collegiate manner to elect a candidate
                    • E.g reported Republican Party split over current candidacy according to the New York Times
                • Can select mavericks that upset the party
                  • E.g Ron Paul who is never invited to the presidential debate because he is seen as too much of a maverick
              • Campaigning
                • Carried out by individual campaign teams not the party as a whole
                  • E.g CREEP or Obama's team with campaign leader David Axelrod and the use of Sam Power
              • Fundraising
                • Most money for candidates now does not come from the party it comes from individuals
                  • Obama raised $750m in 2008 from small donations and Bernie Sanders has raised nearly $95m in individual contributions (Feb 2016)
              • Communication
                • Role of media has taken away the power of the parties
                  • Obama spent $288 million on 504,623 ads (to end of Oct), 82% spent on negative ads. 
        • Microsoft gave $1,890,000 of soft money to the Republicans in 2002
      • Polarisation
        • Since the 1960s there has been a growing partisanship
        • The pew research recorded a record breaking 8 point difference between parties
        • In 1994, 49% of Americans had mixed political views whereas in 2014 only 39% of Americans held mixed political views
          • But those holding mixed political views are less likely to vote
        • In 2014 36% of Republicans viewed the Democrats as dangerous to the nation's well being
        • The arguments over planned parenthood, Obamacare and the Economic Stimulus Package highlight this
        • Shows growing Party politics
      • Partisanship
        • Means loyalty to party
        • John Kerry has a 97% voting record of voting in line with the party
        • Party support in Congress
        • No support from Republicans in the house over Oamacare

Comments

lutikcool

Report

Greetings to all Formula 1 fans! I would like to share the happy news: the final race of the 2023 F1 Championship will be held in Abu Dhabi at Yas Marina Circuit on November 24-26, 2023. It will be an exciting event that all motorsport fans should attend. Don't miss the opportunity to enjoy the beauty and dynamics of racing. Tickets for the event are on sale now at https://formula1-tickets.com/. Let's discuss the upcoming event, share our expectations and predictions. Who do you think will be the champion of this season? Which teams and drivers will show the best results?

Similar Government & Politics resources:

See all Government & Politics resources »See all USA political parties resources »