Labelling

Labelling theories/theorists: Lemert, Cohen, Braithwaite, Cicourel, Becker + evaluation

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Emma
  • Created on: 10-02-14 14:39
View mindmap
  • Labelling
    • Becker: deviance is in the eye of the beholder. No act is deviant in itself, it only becomes deviant when people label it as such
      • Not everyone who commits an offence is punished. Whether a person is arrested/charged depends on interactions with agencies of social control, appearance, background, situation of offence.
    • Piliavin and Briar: police decisions to arrest a youth were mainly based on physical cues e.g. manner/dress
    • CICOUREL: the negotiation of justice
      • Officer's typifications led them to concentrate on certain types. This involved a class bias - working class fitted the police typifications
        • police focused on these areas more intensely, resulting in more arrests and confirming their stereotypes. Justice is FIXED but NEGOTIABLE e.g. upper class parents reasoning, "it will never happen again"
    • LEMERT: Primary/secondary deviance
    • YOUNG: Notting Hill hippies - became a deviant subculture, self fulfilling prophecy, used drugs more. SOCIETAL REACTION HAS CAUSED DEVIANCE.
    • Deviancy amplification spiral - Cohen folk devils and moral panics e.g. Mods and Rockers
      • The media exagrerrate, moral panic is created, public demand tougher action, mods and rockers marginalized, more deviant behaviour
    • Braithwaite - disintegrative shaming: the crime and criminal is labeled, offender excluded from society Reintegrative - labels the act not the actor: easier for criminal to come back into society, "he did a bad thing" not "he's a bad person."
    • Evaluation: it's deterministic, fails to explain why people commit primary deviance in the first place, it implies that without labeling, deviance would not exist

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Crime and deviance resources »