Judicial Precedent
- Created by: erw16
- Created on: 05-11-18 10:37
View mindmap
- Judicial Precedent
- Doctrine of Precedent
- Stare decisis
- Stand by the decision
- Ratio decidendi
- Reason for the decision
- Tuberville v Savage
- Obiter dicta
- Other things said
- Hill v Baxter
- Stare decisis
- Hierarchy of the Courts
- Practice Statement 1966
- Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- Transferred House of Lords Powers to Supreme Court
- Conway v Rimmer 1968
- Supreme Court does not have to follow its own decisions but has to explain why if it chooses not to.
- R v Shivpuri 1986 (first use in a criminal case) avoids decision in Anderton v Ryan
- Herrington v BRB 1972 and Addie v Dumbreck 1929
- Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- Practice Statement 1966
- Types of precedent
- Binding Precedent
- Persuasive precedent
- Grant v Australia Knitting Mills
- The Wagon Mound Cases 1961
- Original Precedent
- Donoghue v Stephenson
- Operation of judicial precedent
- Overruling
- Court in a later case states the decision in an earlier case is wrong
- Higher court overrules an earlier lower court decision
- E.g Supreme Court overrules a decision of the Court of Appeal
- R v Jorge overruled R v Powell and R v England
- R v G and R
- Reversing
- A higher court overturns the decision of a lower court on appeal
- Re Pinochet 1999
- Distinguishing
- Judge avoids following a precedent
- Judge finds the material facts of the current cases are sufficiently different from the case setting a precedent for a distinction to be drawn between the two, they are not bound by the case.
- Merritt v Merritt 1971 and Balfour v Balfour 1919
- R v Brown 1993 and R v Wilson 1996
- Overruling
- Doctrine of Precedent
Comments
No comments have yet been made