Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour
- Created by: Flo
- Created on: 06-06-13 11:43
View mindmap
- Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour
- BIOLOGICAL
- COGNITIVE
- Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour
- BIOLOGICAL
- Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour
- Conclusion- genetics are important and therefore support nature side of nature-nurture debate.
- Gottesman and Shields (Twin and adoption studies of schizophrenia)
- Gottesman and Shields (Twin and adoption studies of schizophrenia)
- REDUCTIONIST- considers schizophrenia as largely caused by genetics and doesnt take into account social or cognitive aspects
- EVALUATION
- Findings- Increased incidence of schizophrenia in adopted children with schiz biological parent.
- Gottesman and Shields (Twin and adoption studies of schizophrenia)
- Gottesman and Shields (Twin and adoption studies of schizophrenia)
- Findings- Increased incidence of schizophrenia in adopted children with schiz biological parent.
- EVALUATION
- Inivestigated possiblilty of creating fear through classical conditioning.
- Watson and Rayner- Little Albert
- BEHAVIOURAL
- Participant- Little Albert aged 11 months- unemotional character.
- Baseline tests showed he had no fearful reactions to a rat, rabbit. dog, monkey, mask with hair or cotton wool. But did have fear to noise of hammer on metal bar.
- EVALUATION
- Unethical- caused psychological damage for at least a month.
- EVALUATION
- Baseline tests showed he had no fearful reactions to a rat, rabbit. dog, monkey, mask with hair or cotton wool. But did have fear to noise of hammer on metal bar.
- CONCLUSION it is possible to condition a fear response which could be generalised to other objects and last over time.
- BEHAVIOURAL
- Watson and Rayner- Little Albert
- Case study in a lab.
- Watson and Rayner- Little Albert
- BEHAVIOURAL
- Participant- Little Albert aged 11 months- unemotional character.
- Baseline tests showed he had no fearful reactions to a rat, rabbit. dog, monkey, mask with hair or cotton wool. But did have fear to noise of hammer on metal bar.
- EVALUATION
- Unethical- caused psychological damage for at least a month.
- EVALUATION
- Baseline tests showed he had no fearful reactions to a rat, rabbit. dog, monkey, mask with hair or cotton wool. But did have fear to noise of hammer on metal bar.
- CONCLUSION it is possible to condition a fear response which could be generalised to other objects and last over time.
- BEHAVIOURAL
- Watson and Rayner- Little Albert
Comments
No comments have yet been made