criminal, AR


?
  • Created by: Emma21023
  • Created on: 05-05-21 13:42
View mindmap
  • Actus Reus
    • Types of AR:
      • State of affairs, situation which def is found irrespective of how they came to be in it; drug posession
        • surrounding circumstance, circums surrounding the def's conduct criminalises otherwise lawful conduct; ****
    • causation; chain of causation- Wallace, Cheshire (direct cause and indirect cause)
      • Factual Causation; but for test (bf def's actions, the events wouldn't have taken place) R v White
      • legal causation; policy-driven notions of culpability, resp, foreseeability to select most approp; blameworthy, factual cause as basis for liability, even if not immediate cause of death. blameworthiness, Hughes then reaffirmed in Taylor
        • substantial cause; R v Cheshire
        • need not be sole or main cause, provided it is a cause; R v Pagett
    • intervening acts (novus actus interveniens); something that occurs after the def's act that breaks the chain of causation & relieves def of resp of prohibited consequence. 3 categories:
      • not all events that occur after def's act will break CoC; (Cheshire shows) only will break if a) an overwhelming cause of death; and b) an unforeseeable circumstance
      • 1. acts of the victim; R v Roberts- makes clear only extreme acts of v will break CoC (thin skull rule?- Blaue)
      • 2. acts of third parties; intervening. (PQ- 1. how sig was their contribution to death, 2. whether their actions were foreseeable
      • 3. naturally occuring events
    • omissions; Eng law req no gen duty to act but situations where liability imposed for failing to act- Duty of Care
      • statutory omissions; child neglect (gen req action in situations where inaction would be unreasonable)
      • Contract; liable if fail to do what contractually bound to do, even though/if person harmed not a party to the contract. R v Pittwood (PQ- partic job, consider what the contract will oblige him to do & whether his failure to do this contributed to death)
      • special relationships; creates duty to act, eg parent/child, hus/wife, doctor/patient. dependance, reliance, resp. Gibbins and Proctor
      • voluntary assumption of care; Gibbins and Proctor; (PQ- who started to provide assistance then ceased)
      • Dangerous situations
  • conduct, def's behaviour is prohibited irrespective of whether it leads to negative consequence; fraud
    • result, a prohibited consequence irrespective of the way it was brought about; murder
    • conduct and result, prohibited outcome that has to be caused in a particular way by specific conduct; arson

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all actus reus resources »