Covenants - Restrictive and Positive
- Created by: Redberryb
- Created on: 28-07-20 16:44
View mindmap
- Covenants
- Restrictive
- Common Law
- Benefit
- Smith & Snipes v River Douglas
- Touches and concerns the land
- Orig parties intended that C should pa**
- Smith & Snipes v River Douglas
- Benefit
- Common Law
- Positive
- Equity
- PC Does not pa** with equity
- Common Law
- Benefit
- Smith & Snipes v River Douglas
- Touches and concerns the land
- Orig parties intended that C should pa**
- Smith & Snipes v River Douglas
- Benefit
- Equity
- Restrictive
- Burden
- Equity
- Restrictive
- Benefit
- Part of a building scheme
- Mutually enforced covenants for to improve quality of land
- RC must touch and concern the land
- A**igned to the succe**or in title
- Annexed to the land of the conventee
- s78 LPA 1925 - By statute
- Part of a building scheme
- Restrictive
- Equity
- Person has to actively do something
- Registered Land
- Notice under ** 32 & 33 LRA 2002
- RC must be registered
- Tulk v Moxhay
- RC Benefits the Dominent Tenament
- There are two pieces of land - Dominent and Servient
- Burden can pa**
- Burden
- Equity
- Benefit
- Part of a building scheme
- Mutually enforced covenants for to improve quality of land
- RC must touch and concern the land
- A**igned to the succe**or in title
- Annexed to the land of the conventee
- s78 LPA 1925 - By statute
- Part of a building scheme
- Benefit
- Equity
- Burden
- Unregistered land
- Cla** D(ii) Lad Charge
- Tulk v Moxhay
- Equity
- PC Does not pa** with equity
Comments
No comments have yet been made