7. when was the evidence for the phonological loop created?
1968
1988
1982
1974
8. what was the evidence for the visuospatial sketchpad?
unfamiliar chinese symbols could be held and remembered later on
phonetically similar lists of words were more difficult to remember whn phonetically different words due to novel episodic memories
no effect was found when participants were played auditory sound when trying to remember a list
participants remembered visually presented numbers while nonsense words were played, this was most effected when nonsense words were like numbers
9. when was the evidence for the episodic buffer created?
2004
2001
2000
1982
10. who created evidence for episodic buffer?
Hue and Ericsson
Copeland and Radvansky
Baddeley
Logie
11. Who made the Multistore Model of Memory?
Atkinson and Shiffrin
Hue and Ericksson
Baddeley and Hitch
Jones, Maken and Nicholls
12. when was evidence against the visuospatial sketchpad created?
1968
1982
1988
1974
13. What year was the Multi store Memory model made?
1988
2000
1968
1974
14. what is the episodic buffer?
the 'mind's eye' and 'voice'
integrates the two slave systems and allows new STM info to be integrated with LTM
the 'mental hands'
the part of the mind capable of integrating all the slave systems and allocating roles
15. What year was the working memory model created?
1974
2000
1968
1988
16. what was the evidence against visuospatial sketchpad?
phonetically similar sits of words are more difficult to remember than phonetically different as the different words create new, episodic memories
should it be divided into visual and spatial?
unfamiliar Chinese characters are remembered in the mind and can be recalled later
participants were asked to remember a list of visual numbers and then were exposed to distracting noise, recall was worst when noise was similar to numbers
17. who created the evidence for the phonological loop?
Atkinson and Shiffrin
Jones, Maken and Nicholls
Salame and Baddeley
Baddeley
18. when was the episodic buffer added to the working memory model?
2004
2000
2001
1988
19. What is the evidence against the phonological store?
no effect when testing irrelevant sounds and similar sounding words when the lists to be remembered were auditory
unfamiliar Chinese symbols could be remembered and recalled later on
phonetically similar sounding lists were more difficult to remember than phonetically different lists - due to novel episodic memories
memory of a list of visually presented numbers was disrupted when audio of nonsense words was played that sounded like numbers
20. what was the evidence for the episodic buffer?
unfamiliar Chinese symbols could be remembered and recalled later on
found that phonetically similar words were more difficult to remember than phonetically different words due to novel episodic memories being created
no effect was found when audio presented words were remembered and then interfered with by audio
visually printed numbers to be remembered were less likely to be remembered if there was conflicting audio that sounded like numbers
