War (Ethics)

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: T Colby
  • Created on: 25-01-16 19:44
What are the two main parts of the Just War Theory?
Jus in bello and Jus post bellum.
1 of 59
What is Jus in bello?
Justice in conduct of the war.
2 of 59
What is Jus post bellum?
Justice after war.
3 of 59
What factors are considered by Jus in bello?
Proportionality, discrimination and non-combatant immunity, obey all international laws on weapons, fair treatment of prisoners of war (POWs), no means mala in se and no reprisals.
4 of 59
Define proportionality.
Using too much force to win is morally wrong.
5 of 59
What is an example of proportionality?
Some argue the dropping of two nuclear bombs on Japan at the end of WW2 was disproportionate.
6 of 59
Define discrimination and non-combatant immunity.
People should choose what should and shouldn't be destroyed in war. This is perhaps between civilians and those waging war.
7 of 59
What is an example of discrimination and non-combatant immunity?
During WW2 the USAAF wanted to bomb German strategic positions whereas the RAF wanted to bomb civilians locations as well. The latter was carried out.
8 of 59
Define obey all international laws on weapons.
Some weapons have tried to be internationally bannded.
9 of 59
What is an example of obey all international laws on weapons?
Mustard gas and napalm are internationally banned in warfare and totally.
10 of 59
Define fair treatment of prisoners.
Treating POWs fairly.
11 of 59
What is an example of fair treatment of prisoners?
Some Russian POWs weren't treated fairly under Nazi captivity in WW2.
12 of 59
Define no means mala in se.
Soldiers are not allowed to use war methods that are evil. For instance ****, genocide, ethnic cleansing, forcing people to fight their own and biological weapons.
13 of 59
What is an example of no means mala in se?
The Holocaust is an example of ethnic cleansing of the Jewish population in Europe in WW2 by the Nazis.
14 of 59
What does no means mala in se translate to?
Wrong or evil in itself.
15 of 59
Define no reprisals.
Trying to make a defeated nation follow rules which escalates violence.
16 of 59
What is an example of no reprisals?
Germany was divided up by its victors in WW2 which escalated violence and disorder.
17 of 59
What are the factors considered by Jus post bellum?
Proportionality, discrimination, rights vindication, punishment, compensation and rehabilitation.
18 of 59
Define proportionality in term sof Jus post bellum.
Should be fair and not with the intention of humiliating the defeated side. Should not cause future problems.
19 of 59
Define discrimination.
Between leaders, soldiers and civilians. Civilian interests should be protected after the war so financial punishments should not be imposed.
20 of 59
Define rights vindication.
Human rights are removed from victims. War should end with the securing of rights.
21 of 59
Define punishment.
Punishment of war losers is unjust. Leaders should face trial under international war tribunals.
22 of 59
Define compensation.
Financial support may be neccessary for a country devastated by war. This needs to be considered in relation to other aspects because it should not be a case of inflicting a punishment but ensuring the raveged country can recover.
23 of 59
Define rebailitation.
A country should change for the better after the war.
24 of 59
What are the three types of pacifism?
Religious (RP), Contingent (CP) and Preferential (PP).
25 of 59
(RP) Jesus called people to what and not to what?
Sacrifical love and not violence.
26 of 59
(RP) We should love whome and do good to whome?
Love our enemies and do good to those who hate us.
27 of 59
Is RP the majority or minority view in the Christian Church?
Minority.
28 of 59
What is the most familiar RP group within the UK?
Quakers (conscientious objectors).
29 of 59
What is a conscientious objector?
Someone who refusus to fight but supports a cause.
30 of 59
What is an example of a conscientious objector?
Paramedic.
31 of 59
Name a famous RP pacifist.
Martin Luther King Jr.
32 of 59
Name a famous Polish RP pacifist.
Lech Watesa.
33 of 59
What famous Catholic monk was an RP pacifist?
Thomas Merton.
34 of 59
Who criticised Augustine's support of violence to defend the innocent?
Mainstream Protestant Walter Wink.
35 of 59
(CP) is not opposed to war on what grounds?
Absolute grounds.
36 of 59
(CP) opposed to war on what grounds?
Contingent grounds.
37 of 59
(CP) all wars involve the killing of whome which is morally what?
Innocent which is morally unjustifiable.
38 of 59
Why does CP support what?
Self-defence and defence of others - the innocent must always be protected.
39 of 59
What is CP against in principle?
Violence and war.
40 of 59
War is sometimes what than violence?
The lesser of the two evils.
41 of 59
(PP) is a preferential option over what?
Violence.
42 of 59
(PP) war has been destructive when?
Throughout history.
43 of 59
What did Pope Paul VI write in Populorum Progressio in 1967?
"To struggle against injustice is to promote the common good. Peace is not just the absence of war".
44 of 59
What are seen as militating against social and international peace?
Social injustices, inequality and lack of human dignity.
45 of 59
What is an example of an act that is accepted by PP?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer's plot to kill Nazi Adolf Hitler.
46 of 59
(PP) what is pacifism about?
How to live life.
47 of 59
(PP) what is this form the promotion of?
Justice and human rights.
48 of 59
What are the two forms of realism?
Realism (R) and Christian Realism (CR).
49 of 59
(R) war is a non what?
Non moral activity.
50 of 59
(R) tries to assess war's what?
Cost.
51 of 59
(R) how does this respond to war?
Responds in terms of its benefits.
52 of 59
(R) what is an example of a benefit of war?
Sometimes gives a state extra land and/or resources.
53 of 59
(R) What are examples of actions that are wrong but not for nations?
Killing, maiming and stealing.
54 of 59
(R) How can nations go to war?
Without considering or being judged by morality.
55 of 59
(R) How does a nation survive in war?
By looking after its own interests.
56 of 59
(R) ethics and what are not comparible/do not exist?
War.
57 of 59
(CR) uses what to restrain evil?
Force.
58 of 59
(CR) people must rise above what in war?
Self-interest.
59 of 59

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What is Jus in bello?

Back

Justice in conduct of the war.

Card 3

Front

What is Jus post bellum?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What factors are considered by Jus in bello?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Define proportionality.

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Ethics resources:

See all Ethics resources »See all War (Ethics) resources »