Endangerment of life must come from damage (Shots fired through a window, broken glass did not endanger life)
1 of 8
R v Wenton
Endangerment of life must come from damage (A window was broken so a petrol bomb could be thrown through, broken window did not endanger life)
2 of 8
Warwick
Endangerment of life did come from damage (Car smashed into police car and broken glass endangered life)
3 of 8
R v Sangha
Whether life is actually endangered is irrelevant, it is their intention to endanger life that matters (flats set on fire even though they were empty)
4 of 8
R v Prmbilton
There needs to be intention to damage/destroy (D only threw stone to stop fight)
5 of 8
R v G & R
Reckless = aware of a risk that is or could be or a result where a risk could occur and the D knows in the circumstances that it is unreasonable to take the risk
6 of 8
R v Cooper
Recklessness = subjective (Amy did not have the intention)
7 of 8
Merrick
Whose the property is = irrelevant (Wires exposed, would have been the same outcome if the owner of the house had of left them exposed instead of the builder)
8 of 8
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Endangerment of life must come from damage (A window was broken so a petrol bomb could be thrown through, broken window did not endanger life)
Back
R v Wenton
Card 3
Front
Endangerment of life did come from damage (Car smashed into police car and broken glass endangered life)
Back
Card 4
Front
Whether life is actually endangered is irrelevant, it is their intention to endanger life that matters (flats set on fire even though they were empty)
Back
Card 5
Front
There needs to be intention to damage/destroy (D only threw stone to stop fight)
Comments
No comments have yet been made