UNIT 3 - OFFENCES AND PARTIAL DEFENCES 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawA2/A-levelAQA Created by: 2013woottendCreated on: 25-05-15 17:23 Who defined murder? Lord Coke 1 of 21 Which case laid out the rules on direct intent? Mohan 2 of 21 Which case laid out the rules on indirect intent? Woollin 3 of 21 Which case laid out the rules on factual causation? Pagett 4 of 21 Which case laid out the rules on legal causation? Smith 5 of 21 Which act is diminished responsiability under? Homicide 6 of 21 In which case was abnormality of mental functioning defined in? Byrne 7 of 21 Which case defined 'substantial' impairment? Lloyd 8 of 21 Which act is loss of control under? Coroners and Justice 9 of 21 Which act stated that sexual infidelity could not be a qualifying trigger? Clinton 10 of 21 Which case stated that if there was a considered desire for revenge the defence of loss of control couldn't be used? Ibrams and Gregory 11 of 21 Which case stated that an act must be unlawful? Franklin 12 of 21 Which act stated that an omission was not sufficient for unlawful act manslaughter? Lowe 13 of 21 Under which test is it decided whether an act is objectively dangerous? Church 14 of 21 Under which case was it held that the defendant did not have to forsee a particular type of harm? JM and SM 15 of 21 Which case laid out the rules on gross negligence manslaughter? Adomako 16 of 21 In which case was 'gross' defined first? Bateman 17 of 21 Which case decided that there must be a specific risk of death? Misra 18 of 21 Which case held that an act in a battery could be indirect? DPP v K 19 of 21 Which case held that psychiatric harm could be ABH? Chan Fook 20 of 21 Which case held that psychiatric harm could be GBH? Burstow 21 of 21
Comments
No comments have yet been made