DURATION OF STM. STM no rehearsal by doing continent trigrams. 3s-80% 18s-10% correct recall.
1 of 9
Glanser and Cunitz
STM & LTM. Free recall 1&2 conditions. Found the expected serial curve.
2 of 9
Miller
MEMORY. Memory span determined by 'chunk' rather than individual items. 1-XGW 2-BAQ, KAB 3-SUN, BIT. 1-3 hard-easy.
3 of 9
Bahrick
DURATION OF LTM. 392 US Grads. Recognition tasks, recalling names and matching names to a picture. 34 years was good, 47 was poor. May be due to ageing rather than duration of LTM.
4 of 9
Sperling
SENSORY. 50 milliseconds graph 4or5/12. 50 milliseconds graph, 3 tones, could recall 3or4 per line which means 9/12 in total.
5 of 9
Baddelely
ENCODING-Acoustic similar words 7+-2. Acoustic similar encoding, visual acoustic. Harder to recall due to acoustic confusion.
6 of 9
Atkinson and Shiffron
Created multi-store model. Input - Sensory (If not played attention to is lost) - STM (can be lost vis displacement) - (retrieval) - LTM (can forget via displacement). LTM to STM is rehearsal.
7 of 9
Conrad
ENCODING- Acoustic similar/dissimilar and semantic similar/dissimilar. Encoding acoustic- harder to recall. STM codes acoustically.
8 of 9
Jacobs
CAPACITY OF STM. Digit span technique (recall immediately and gradually increases). 7+-2 capacity of STM.
9 of 9
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
STM & LTM. Free recall 1&2 conditions. Found the expected serial curve.
Back
Glanser and Cunitz
Card 3
Front
MEMORY. Memory span determined by 'chunk' rather than individual items. 1-XGW 2-BAQ, KAB 3-SUN, BIT. 1-3 hard-easy.
Back
Card 4
Front
DURATION OF LTM. 392 US Grads. Recognition tasks, recalling names and matching names to a picture. 34 years was good, 47 was poor. May be due to ageing rather than duration of LTM.
Back
Card 5
Front
SENSORY. 50 milliseconds graph 4or5/12. 50 milliseconds graph, 3 tones, could recall 3or4 per line which means 9/12 in total.
Comments
No comments have yet been made