More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

What did the case of Reeves v MPC show?

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

What did the case of Orange v CC West Yorkshire show?

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

Note ->

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

In what case did vandals get in to a locked property and set fire to the property damaging other properties around it? What did the courts conclude?

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

In what case did the c get injured whilst at work and 6 years later commit suicide? His wife sued the company for his death. What was the outcome?

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

Secondly, for legal causation, you must look at remoteness of damage. There are two strains of thought on how to decide if the damage was two remote. What two cases evidence this?

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

What was the ruling principle in Re Polemis for remoteness of damage?

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

What was the ruling principle in the Wagon Mound N01?

Back

Preview of the front of card 13

Card 14

Front

The privy council said in the Wagon Mound, if some, even minor damage is forseeable, the d is liable, irrespective of the extent. Is this true?

Back

Preview of the front of card 14

Card 15

Front

The kind of damage only must be forseeable. What case evidences this?

Back

Preview of the front of card 15
View more cards