Tort 0.0 / 5 ? LawTortUniversityAll boards Created by: lizziegill17Created on: 31-05-17 10:58 14 day deterioration not proximate sion v Hampstead HA 1 of 21 Watched mother collapse and die 3 months after negligent cause - relevant time is negligent act Taylor v A novo 2 of 21 seeing effect of clinical neg 24 hrs after proximate Farrell v merton 3 of 21 sudden psychological impact - 36 hrs for baby to die yet held as single impact or event North Glamorgan NHS trust v Walters 4 of 21 If E's negligence causes C to believe he is an instrument of death or injury, no Alcock restrictions Dooley v Cammell 5 of 21 innocently introduced abuser into home - Involuntary participant w v essex 6 of 21 parents PV when children's organs harvested negligently without permission Re Organ Retention Group 7 of 21 self-endangerment no duty as undesirable litigation from domestic accidents and unnecessary restriction on autonomy Greatorex v Greatorex 8 of 21 prolonged exposure to stress - PI need not stem from a sudden event Hatton. v Sutherland 9 of 21 witnessed destruction of home held duty for PI Attia v British Gas Plc 10 of 21 no general duty to prevent harm in absence of prior relationship Smith v little woods ; Michael v CC South Wales 11 of 21 D ignored cries for help as C drowned - no liability Osterlind v Hill 12 of 21 Special relationship between C and D where undertaken to act or induced c's reliance stovin v wise 13 of 21 undertaking of reship - decorator stansbie v Troman 14 of 21 distinguish failure to prevent drunkenness and failings in care after AoR Barrett v Ministry of defence 15 of 21 non-delegable duty Woodland v Swimming pool 16 of 21 Assumption of control over sport induced reliance Watson v British Boxing 17 of 21 Parent company - reliance must be reasonable chandler v cape 18 of 21 source of danger over which D had control Dorset yacht v home office 19 of 21 D had no control over Joyrider Topp v London country bus 20 of 21 horses left unattended in street - liability as source of danger sparked off by C Haynes v Harwood 21 of 21
Comments
No comments have yet been made