Back to quiz

6. The defendant spoke little english, got in a taxi and handed the driver a note, the driver said this wasnt enough so the student handed his wallet asking the driver to take what he needed, the driver took too much

  • Lawrence
  • Gomez
  • Hinks
  • Morris
  • Pitham and Hehl

7. For dishonestly to be proven, the Gosh test is used, the first part is 'was the action dishonest by the standards of reasonable and honest people?', the second part is

  • If so did the defendant realise what he was doing was dishonest by those standards
  • If so did the defendant realise what he was doing was not dishonest by those standards

8. Other intangible property refers to rights which have no physical prescence

  • True, from the case of A-G Hong Kong v Chan Nai Keung
  • False

9. Property received under obligation is under which section of the Theft Act

  • S5 (3)
  • S5 (4)
  • S6
  • S1 (3)

10. Personal property are items such as CDs, books, jewellery, cars and even aeroplanes

  • True
  • Fasle

11. In the case of Velumyl, the defendant intended to replace the money later however he was still guilty as he would not have been able to replace the notes with the exact same notes

  • True
  • False

12. The defendant sold furniture belonging to another person - appropriation is assuming the rights of the owner

  • Gomez
  • Hinks
  • Pitham and Hehl
  • Morris
  • Lawrence

13. Tickets such as train tickets and parking tickets represent things in action, they represent a right to be there, a case illustrating this is

  • Morris
  • Marshall
  • Oxford v Moss
  • Shah

14. Where money or cheques are given for a particular purpose, they must be used for that purpose or they can be convicted of theft

  • Lawrence
  • Davidge and Bunnet
  • Morris
  • Oxford and Moss

15. S4 (2) a)

  • A person not in possession of the land severs anything from the land that the owner has not allowed them to take
  • A personal representative or trustee takes land in breech of his duties
  • A tenant takes a fixture or structure from the land let to him

16. A person can steal land if they have the ability to transfer the land to another, however this is not his to transfer

  • S4 (2) a)
  • S4 (2) b)

17. The case of Robson illustrates the defendant having the belief that he had the right to take property

  • True
  • False

18. Under section ___, even if the defendant says he/she will pay or has left money he may still be liable

  • S4 (2)
  • S2 (2)
  • S1

19. In this case, it was decided that body parts could be (personal) property, but only if they had acquired different attributes by virtue of application or skill eg preservation

  • Kelly
  • Oxford v Moss
  • Marshall
  • R v Smith

20. The last element to be proven is that the defendant had the intention to permanently deprive the victim

  • True
  • False