theft 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawA2/A-levelAQA Created by: jenniferdcruzCreated on: 13-05-14 11:46 what is the actus reus of theft ? appropriation of property belonging to another 1 of 12 what is the mens rea of theft ? intention to permanently deprive and dishonesty 2 of 12 what did the ghosh test show ? 2 part test for dishonesty 3 of 12 which case shows the swapping labels in morrisons to pay less money is theft ? morris 4 of 12 goods handed over for worthless cheques ? consent ? Gomez 5 of 12 in the case of oxford v moss was the defendant guilty of theft? no as there was insufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive plus it was an issue of copy right not property 6 of 12 which case showed that body parts can be propertyof the uni even though in common law noone has the rights to a corpse as it took on a use for teachin kelly 7 of 12 in webster was it found that keeping duplicate property or selling it amounted to theft? yes as the defendant aquired the medal illegally by lying and then made a profit of it 8 of 12 what did davidge and bunnet show? that where cheques are given for a particular purpose they must be used for this purpose 9 of 12 which case shows that destroying property can ammount to intention to permanently deprive ? dpp v j 10 of 12 easom showed conditional intent ? only intend to permanently deprive once something worth stealing is found? true 11 of 12 if the defendant genuinely believed they had a right to the property it is not theft ? and which case ? true , small - abondoned car 12 of 12
Comments
No comments have yet been made