6. easom showed conditional intent ? only intend to permanently deprive once something worth stealing is found?
true
false
7. which case showed that body parts can be propertyof the uni even though in common law noone has the rights to a corpse as it took on a use for teachin
kelly
keller
addy
mayor
8. what is the actus reus of theft ?
appropriation of property belonging to another
appropriation of belongings
stealing something
9. which of these is not a type of property
ideas
house
boyfriend
money
10. what is the mens rea of theft ?
intention to permanently deprive and dishonesty
never giving the stuff back
dishonesty
11. which case found the defendants guilty of selling refuse without sharing the profits with the council ?
williams v phillips
williams v k
phillipsv willhelm
12. in webster was it found that keeping duplicate property or selling it amounted to theft?
yes as the defendant aquired the medal illegally by lying and then made a profit of it
no as the medal was meant for the officer anyway
13. what did the ghosh test show ?
2 part test for dishonesty
shocking behaviour by d
dishonesty rule
14. which case shows that destroying property can ammount to intention to permanently deprive ?
