Other questions in this quiz

2. in webster was it found that keeping duplicate property or selling it amounted to theft?

  • yes as the defendant aquired the medal illegally by lying and then made a profit of it
  • no as the medal was meant for the officer anyway

3. in the case of oxford v moss was the defendant guilty of theft?

  • no as there was insufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive plus it was an issue of copy right not property
  • yes as he stole the information on the exam papers

4. what is the mens rea of theft ?

  • intention to permanently deprive and dishonesty
  • never giving the stuff back
  • dishonesty

5. which of these is not a type of property

  • ideas
  • house
  • boyfriend
  • money

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »