Other questions in this quiz

2. which case shows that destroying property can ammount to intention to permanently deprive ?

  • dpp v j
  • dpp v k

3. in the case of oxford v moss was the defendant guilty of theft?

  • no as there was insufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive plus it was an issue of copy right not property
  • yes as he stole the information on the exam papers

4. which case found the defendants guilty of selling refuse without sharing the profits with the council ?

  • phillipsv willhelm
  • williams v phillips
  • williams v k

5. what is the mens rea of theft ?

  • dishonesty
  • intention to permanently deprive and dishonesty
  • never giving the stuff back


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »