1. easom showed conditional intent ? only intend to permanently deprive once something worth stealing is found?
1 of 14
Other questions in this quiz
2. in webster was it found that keeping duplicate property or selling it amounted to theft?
- yes as the defendant aquired the medal illegally by lying and then made a profit of it
- no as the medal was meant for the officer anyway
3. in the case of oxford v moss was the defendant guilty of theft?
- no as there was insufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive plus it was an issue of copy right not property
- yes as he stole the information on the exam papers
4. what is the mens rea of theft ?
- intention to permanently deprive and dishonesty
- never giving the stuff back
5. which of these is not a type of property