HideShow resource information

1. what did davidge and bunnet show?

  • the cheques given must have legal terms not just moral
  • that where cheques are given for a particular purpose they must be used for this purpose
  • the owner of the cash has the right to do what he wants
1 of 14

Other questions in this quiz

2. in the case of oxford v moss was the defendant guilty of theft?

  • no as there was insufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive plus it was an issue of copy right not property
  • yes as he stole the information on the exam papers

3. which case shows the swapping labels in morrisons to pay less money is theft ?

  • kenedy
  • morris
  • morrison
  • gomez

4. which case shows that destroying property can ammount to intention to permanently deprive ?

  • dpp v j
  • dpp v k

5. which case found the defendants guilty of selling refuse without sharing the profits with the council ?

  • phillipsv willhelm
  • williams v phillips
  • williams v k


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »