The crazy contract ka-wizz! 0.0 / 5 ? LawContractUniversityAll boards Created by: BethCreated on: 12-12-16 15:11 Contains an explanation of unilateral contracts by Coulson LJ Intense Investments Ltd v Development Ventures Ltd - [2006] 1 of 7 Which case showed that consideration need not be reasonable to be good? Chappell v Nestle (1960) 2 of 7 intention to create legal relations can generally be found in business agreements Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise - [1976] 3 of 7 Which case determined whether a term was 'necessary' enough to be applied through the business efficacy test? The Moorcock (1889) 4 of 7 From which case does the business efficacy test come? BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 5 of 7 From which case does the bystander test come? Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] 6 of 7 The exclusion clause did not apply. It was on the sales receipt, which was only seen after the customer entered into the contract. Chapleton v Barry UDC [1940] 7 of 7
Comments
No comments have yet been made