TB9 SPA Lecture 3; Political communication

?
  • Created by: mint75
  • Created on: 04-05-16 16:42
What is a critique of Atkinsons (1984) analysis of rhetoric?
Does not use comprehensive sampling- may not be representative of political speech making as a whole
1 of 14
What may explain the remainder of applause in political speeches?
Synchrony, speech content, uninvited applause, delivery, culture
2 of 14
In Bulls & Wells (2002), what % of applause was synchronised with speech suggesting Atkinson overestimates synchrony?
66%
3 of 14
In Bulls & Wells (2002), what % of applause was uninvited due to direct response to speech content or misreading of rhetorical devices?
14%
4 of 14
Was uninvited applause described by Atkinson?
No
5 of 14
How does delivery affect applause according to Atkinson?
Delivery increases the chance of a rhetorical device receiving applause
6 of 14
How does delivery affect applause according to Bulls & Wells?
Delivery indicates whether or not a rhetorical device is to be taken as an applause invitation
7 of 14
What kind of device may be distinctive to British political culture?
Implicit devices
8 of 14
When may politicians equivocate?
If posed a high proportion of communicative conflict situations
9 of 14
In Bull et al (1996s) analysis of face threats in political interviews, what were the three superordinate categories?
Personal face, face of the party they represent, face of significant others
10 of 14
In Bull et al (1996s) analysis of face threats in political interviews, to CC questions what was the modal response?
Equivocation
11 of 14
In Bull et al (1996s) analysis of face threats in political interviews, what was the modal response to non-conflictual questions?
Replies
12 of 14
In a study of audience participation by Bull (2003), what did interviewers do significantly more?
CC questions
13 of 14
In a study of audience participation by Bull (2003), what were there correlations between?
CC questions and equivocation
14 of 14

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What may explain the remainder of applause in political speeches?

Back

Synchrony, speech content, uninvited applause, delivery, culture

Card 3

Front

In Bulls & Wells (2002), what % of applause was synchronised with speech suggesting Atkinson overestimates synchrony?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

In Bulls & Wells (2002), what % of applause was uninvited due to direct response to speech content or misreading of rhetorical devices?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Was uninvited applause described by Atkinson?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all TB9 SPA resources »