Other questions in this quiz

2. How does delivery affect applause according to Bulls & Wells?

  • Delivery indicates whether or not a rhetorical device is to be taken as an applause invitation
  • Delivery increases the chance of a rhetorical device receiving applause

3. In Bull et al (1996s) analysis of face threats in political interviews, to CC questions what was the modal response?

  • Direct response
  • Equivocation
  • Replies
  • Ambiguous response

4. Which of these characterises non-interrogative syntax?

  • Declarative, moodless, indirect
  • Moodless, indirect, Yes/no/polar
  • Yes/no/polar, alternative/disjunctive, wh-/interrogative word
  • Yes/no/polar, alternative/disjunctive, indirect

5. In Bulls & Wells (2002), what % of applause was uninvited due to direct response to speech content or misreading of rhetorical devices?

  • 10%
  • 60%
  • 14%
  • 20%


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all TB9 SPA resources »