TB6 D&L Lecture 4; How do we use language?

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: mint75
  • Created on: 04-01-16 15:02

1. What was the main finding of a study by ferreria et al (2005) in avoiding ambiguity?

  • Pps could only reduce linguitic ambiguity and otherwise operated egocentrically
  • Pps aimed to establish common ground in both conditions, but ESPECIALLY for non-linguistic ambiguity
  • Pps operated egocentrically and did not aim to establish common ground in either condition
  • Pps aimed to establish common ground in both conditions, but ESPECIALLY for linguistic ambiguity
1 of 14

Other questions in this quiz

2. How do one stage models of understanding indirect speech work?

  • Extraction either parallel literal and non-literal, or ONLY non-literal. Depends on context AND type of indirect speech.
  • Extraction either parallel literal and non-literal, or ONLY literal. Depends on type of indirect speech but NOT context.
  • Extraction either parallel literal and non-literal, or ONLY literal. Depends on context AND type of indirect speech.
  • Extraction either parallel literal and non-literal, or ONLY non-literal. Depends on context but not type of indirect speech.

3. Tanenhaus et al (1995) "put the apple on the towel into..." Which condition has the least ambiguity?

  • Neither condition, they are equally ambiguous
  • Two referent condition; abides by quantity maxim
  • Both conditions
  • One referent condition; abides by quantity maxim

4. What was the main finding of Keysar et al (2000)?

  • Pps always fixated towards occluded objects, suggesting inhibition
  • Pps never fixated towards occluded objects, suggesting inhibition
  • Although there was a representation of common ground, pps initial response was often egocentric, suggesting inhibition
  • There was a no representation of common ground, pps initial response was often egocentric, suggesting no inhibition

5. What is the difference between indirect and direct speech acts?

  • Direct speech acts (approx 10% of lang) intend the literal meaning. Indirect speech acts (approx 90% lang) move beyond the literal meaning
  • Direct speech acts (approx 90% lang) move beyond the literal meaning, Indirect speech acts (approx 10% of lang) intend the literal meaning.
  • Direct speech acts (approx 90% of lang) intend the literal meaning. Indirect speech acts (approx 10% lang) move beyond the literal meaning
  • Direct speech acts (approx 10% lang) move beyond the literal meaning, Indirect speech acts (approx 90% of lang) intend the literal meaning.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all TB7 D&L resources »