Supreme court cases 0.0 / 5 ? Government & PoliticsThe Supreme CourtA2/A-levelEdexcel Created by: Katie PriceCreated on: 27-04-16 05:55 Madison V Marbury 1803 - Judiciary gave themselfes the power of judicial review 1 of 22 Plessy V Ferguson 1894 - upheld racial segregation under "seperate but equal" 2 of 22 Brown V Board of Education 1954 - overturned plessy v ferguson. declared segregated schools unconstitutional 3 of 22 Miranda V Arizona 1966 extende 5th ammendment rights 4 of 22 Roe V Wade 1973 ruled in favour of abortion under the 14th amendment freedom of personal choice 5 of 22 Buckley V Valeo 1976 - Struck down 1974 FECA which attempted to regulate spending in eletions. But unconstitutional as it is a restriction of free speech 6 of 22 California V Bakke 1978 - upheld AA 7 of 22 Clinton V New York 1998 - Declared use of line-item veto unconstituional 8 of 22 Selman V Simmons-Harris 2002 - upheld programme in ohio that gave financial help to parents to send their children to a religious or private school 9 of 22 Gratz V Bollinger 2003 - struck down parts of AA as racial quotas were unconstitutional 10 of 22 Grutter V Bollinger 2003 - upheld individual AA. Hoped it would not be needed in 25 years time. 11 of 22 Gonzales V Carhart 2007 - upheld partial birth abortion act, putting limits to Roe V Wade 12 of 22 DC V Heller 2008 - struck down gun restriction laws. unconstitutional under the 2nd amendment. 13 of 22 Citizens united V FEC 2010 - Gave rise to soft money in elections 14 of 22 NFIB (National federation of independent business V. Sibelius 2012 - Upheld Affordable Care Act, as it was effectively a congress imposed tax 15 of 22 Fisher V University of Texas 2013 - upheld AA 16 of 22 Boumediene V Bush 2008 - Enemy prisoners could not be detaint indefinitely without recieving a fair trial 17 of 22 Obergefell V Hodges 2015 - Same Sex Marriage made constitutional under the 14th amendment 18 of 22 Snyder V Phelps 2011 - Pressure groups are able to protest at fnerals "free speech" - 1st amendment - Judicial restraint 19 of 22 Shelby V Holder 2013 - parts of voting rights act of 1965 were got rid of. 20 of 22 Riley V California 2014 - warantless search and seisure of digital contents 21 of 22 McCutcheon Vs FEC 2014 - Reduced campaign restrictions - extended its ruling on citizens utd 22 of 22
Comments
No comments have yet been made