Other questions in this quiz

2. What was held in Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Assoc.?

  • 'spouse' doesnt apply, but 'family' can include a longstanding, close, loving relationship.
  • He wasnt 'spouse' or 'family'
  • Nurses could be considered as 'registered medical practitioners'

3. Ratio of Re Sigsworth

  • Actions were included in the Act's intention
  • No ambiguity but judges decided it would be 'repugnant to public policy' so Parliament couldnt have intended it
  • 'vicinity of' should be near/on the place- guilty

4. Who disagreed with Denning, and what did he say?

  • Lord Simmonds, that it was a 'naked usurpation of the legislative function'
  • Magor, that Simmonds was wrong

5. What was the word interpreted in Muir v Keay, and what was held?

  • 'entertainment'- it included drinking coffee, not just musical or theatre. So D committed an offence
  • 'street'- she was found guilty because the action was included in the Acts intention
  • 'entitled'- not guilty, a dead person is not actually entitled to vote

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Statutory Interpretation resources »