1. What was the word interpreted in Muir v Keay, and what was held?
- 'entitled'- not guilty, a dead person is not actually entitled to vote
- 'entertainment'- it included drinking coffee, not just musical or theatre. So D committed an offence
- 'street'- she was found guilty because the action was included in the Acts intention
1 of 20
Other questions in this quiz
2. Ratio of Fisher v Bell
- Betting shop wasn't indoors, so not guilty
- Weapons were an 'invation to treat'- so inviting customers to make offers to buy goods- aquitted
- Cloth bag wasnt the same as a case or canister, guilty
3. Facts of Adler v George, and which rule/approach?
- Golden Rule (Broad Approach)- Got into RAF Station, which was restricted. it was an offence to be in vicinity of prohibited place
- Killed his mother in order to inherit her estate
- His partner died, who had been the tenant of the house, but they had lived together for 20 years
4. Singh v Bhakar was a case about bullying, why was the woman found guilty?
- She wasnt found guilty
- Even though the Act intended to prevent stalkers it could include victims of bullying
- She was stalking the victim
5. What does Bulmer LTD v Bollinger SA tell us?
- The EU used the purposive approach, so why shouldnt we?
- The US uses the purposive approach, so why shouldnt we?
- We shouldn't use the purposive approach