Split brain research 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyDaveUniversityAll boards Created by: ruby_wardenCreated on: 13-05-17 15:38 Akelaitis (1941) suggested no effects of split brain procedure 1 of 11 Gazzaniga (1962) first study to show lateralised differences in split brain patient, LVF = didn't see anything 2 of 11 Kingstone & Gazzaniga (1995) two words presented, drawn as separate objects 3 of 11 Language = LH LH shows compatibility effect - priming, RH does not 4 of 11 Global processing = RH global = RH, local = RH, look at drawing of large M made of small Zs - navon figure 5 of 11 Face recognition = RH RH appears specialised for face recognition, especially for unfamiliar faces 6 of 11 De Renzi damage to RH = prosopagnosia temporal 7 of 11 Kelley et al (1998) fMRI data shows evidence for RH advantage with faces 8 of 11 Schacter and Singer (1962) epinephrine experiment shows need to create plausible hypotheses 9 of 11 Gazzangia (1970)s suggests LH is the interpreter, gives us a sense of being a rational agent 10 of 11 Corballis et al (1999) RH can do amodal completion of kanizsa illusion - so can mice, evolution 11 of 11
Comments
No comments have yet been made