Importance of social identity in predicting collective action; support for SIMCA
2 of 11
Dixon & Durheim (2004)
Desegregation produces a re-organisation of space and place: holiday makers, white and black people
3 of 11
Duckitt & Sibley (2009)
Dual-process motivational model; RWA & SDO
4 of 11
Barlow et al. (2012)
Neg contact increase prejudices more than pos contact reduces it
5 of 11
Hiel & Mervielde (2003)
Extremism predicts cognitive complexity; contrats value pluralism theory
6 of 11
Doosje et al. (2016)
3 phases of radicalisation; sensitivity, group membership & action
7 of 11
Douglas et al. (2017)
Conspiracy theories are appealing but do not really fulfil needs/people's motivations
8 of 11
Graham et al. (2009)
Conservatives= care more about all 5 more equally; liberals care more about harm/care and fairness
9 of 11
Dubois et al. (2015)
Power related; income but not education predicted unethical behaviour; low social class more likely to behave unethically for others but high class for self
10 of 11
Stephens et al. (2014)
Spending time in social contexts produces certain culture specific ways of behaving; contexts are middle class structured making social mobility difficult
11 of 11
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Importance of social identity in predicting collective action; support for SIMCA
Back
Zomeron et al. (2008)
Card 3
Front
Desegregation produces a re-organisation of space and place: holiday makers, white and black people
Back
Card 4
Front
Dual-process motivational model; RWA & SDO
Back
Card 5
Front
Neg contact increase prejudices more than pos contact reduces it
Comments
No comments have yet been made