section 8 orders

?
  • Created by: azdw
  • Created on: 05-06-17 22:15
s12 CFA 2014
changed residence and contact orders to child arrangements orders
1 of 41
Re R [1993]
specific issue orders
2 of 41
Re H (prohibited steps order) [1995]
prohibited steps orders
3 of 41
re C (Adoption: residence order) [1992]
a parent without parental responsibility can apply for a s8 order under s10(4)
4 of 41
s10(4) CA 1989
a parent without parental responsibility can apply for a s8 order
5 of 41
s10(9) CA 1989
those who cannot apply under s10(4) can apply under s10(9) for leave of court
6 of 41
Re G (children) (residence: same sex couples) [2006]
baroness hale said 3 ways of being parent
7 of 41
3 ways of being a parent according to baroness hale
genetic, gestational, social and psychological
8 of 41
s1(3) CA 1989
court must consider the welfare checklist under this section in considering whether to grant a s8 order
9 of 41
s1(2) CA 1989
any delay in proceedings is considered to be detrimental to the child's upbringing
10 of 41
s14(2) CFA 2014
proceedings should be commenced within 26 weeks
11 of 41
Family Justice Review Final Report 2011
proceedings are not usually commenced within the 26 week time reccomendations
12 of 41
s12(1A) 1989
the court must consider under this section whether to award parental responsibility to the parent who doesn't have the residence order
13 of 41
J-S [2002]
in practice it is extremely rare for the courts to refuse to grant PR, in this case the father was using his contact order to harass the mother but they still gave him PR because he met the requirements under Re H [1991]
14 of 41
Re H [1991]
says requirements as to whether to award parental responsibility or not
15 of 41
s1(4) CA 1989
court must adhere to principles of welfare checklist
16 of 41
s1(1) CA 1989
courts paramount consideration must be the welfare of the child
17 of 41
guillick v west norfolk health authority [1986]
fraser competence
18 of 41
fraser competence
take into account child's maturity and understanding
19 of 41
clarke v newcombe [1983]
two siblings had different desires and the court went with the views of the older sibling
20 of 41
Re P (a minor) (education) [1991]
14 year old boys wishes were taken into account when deciding whether he should be sent to boarding school or not
21 of 41
Re R (a minor) (residence: religion) [1993]
if the religious orientation of parents and in relation to childs upbringing is not detrimental to their social or emotional wellbeing the court will not be prejudicial against the parent
22 of 41
J v B (ultra orthodox judaism transgender) [2017]
father only permitted indirect contact because
23 of 41
J v B (ultra orthodox judaism transgender) [2017]
father only permitted indirect contact because
24 of 41
J v B (ultra orthodox judaism transgender) [2017]
father only permitted indirect contact to avoid detriment to child's societal welfare
25 of 41
Re L (contact: domestic violence) [2000]
domestic violence is not a bar to contact but it is one factor to consider delicately when exercising discretion
26 of 41
Re O (a child) (contact: withdrawal of application) [2003]
said contact should only be withdrawn as a last resort where there is no alternative
27 of 41
s1(2A) CA 1989 as amended by s11 CFA 2014
general principle is child should have relationship with both parents as it is beneficial to their upbringing
28 of 41
Re L (contact:domestic violence) [2000]
parental involvement principle can be rebutted in cases of domestic violence
29 of 41
Jeanette Ashton in her 2015 article
said s11 CFA 2014 was a swing too far in favour of fathers and nothing more than a hollow policy statement
30 of 41
Re P (contact: supervision) [1996]
it is almost always in the childs best interests to have contact with the parent who does not possess the residence order
31 of 41
s11A CA 1989
a parent should undergo an activity to promote contact such as anger management
32 of 41
s63 magistrates court act 1980
if one party fails to comply with a s8 order thats in place they are subject to a fine or up to 2 years imprisonment
33 of 41
A v N [1997]
if one party fails to comply with a s8 order thats in place they are subject to a fine or up to 2 years imprisonment
34 of 41
s11J CA 1989
can also be subject to 40-200 hours unpaid work if do not comply with s8 order
35 of 41
Re A (residence order) [2009]
transfer of residence is a judicial weapon of last resort
36 of 41
Re S (transfer of residence) [2010]
transfer of residence can be done even if the child wishes to remain
37 of 41
Re A (a child) (intractable contact proceedings) [2013]
when making a contact order the court should also create a strategy to enforce that order in event of non compliance
38 of 41
s11J (7) CA 1989
court should consider the welfare of the child in circumstances of transfer of residence
39 of 41
child arrangements programme practice direction 12B para 21
sets out what court should consider when enforcing a contact order. reasons for non compliance, childs wishes and feelings, advice from Cafcass
40 of 41
family law protocol 4th edn
endorses a commitment to resolve disputes in a non confrontational manner so as to encourage agreements
41 of 41

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Re R [1993]

Back

specific issue orders

Card 3

Front

Re H (prohibited steps order) [1995]

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

re C (Adoption: residence order) [1992]

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

s10(4) CA 1989

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all law in relation to children resources »