Scientific benefits against Ethical costs

HideShow resource information
What is the definition of scientific benefit?
In terms of psychological research scientific benefits are concerned with what we can learn about human behaviour
1 of 51
What can this information be?
tested and retested in order to provide soilid evidence which intervention and practical applications can be created
2 of 51
What are examples of benefits?
broard and can include any understanding of behaviour that can help to improve the waulity of people's lives
3 of 51
What do specific examples include?
social change that prevents undesirable behaviour and explanations and treatments of psychological disorders such as schizophrenia
4 of 51
What is the definition of ethical costs?
In psychological research they refer to a moral threshold that has been breached
5 of 51
What could examples include?
failing to protect pps from harm failing to gain informed consent and deception
6 of 51
Any research that places a psychological pp in what?
a position they would not normally be in could place themat risk of ethical costs occuring
7 of 51
Example?
Milgram
8 of 51
What are other types of ethical costs?
misuse of psychological research to presecute or discriminate against certain groups in society
9 of 51
What is the question?
Whether what scientific psychologists can learn from psychological experiments and what we have to do to gain this information is something that is hotly argued
10 of 51
What are we questionning?
Whether the individual or animal invilved in research is more important than what we can learn to benefit the wider population
11 of 51
Or should we be asking what?
Whether the findings of psychological research will really make a difference?
12 of 51
the ethical cost of the animal or individual in a study can sometimes be?
anticipated and measured accurately but the scientific benefit of such research is harder to measure
13 of 51
what is one scientific benefit of psychological research?
its potential to prevent undesirable behaviour
14 of 51
If we can understand the reasoning behind what?
actions then perhaps we can stop them
15 of 51
What did Zimbardo describe?
the Lucifer effect to explain the evil carried out in Iraq by Abu Ghraib
16 of 51
In his original stanford Prison experiment he was able to show what?
how well meaning individuals would conform to social roles that conflicted with every day behaviours
17 of 51
What does he suggest?
taking heed of his research and research of others in the field (eg: Milgram) events and behaviours such as those at Abu Ghtaib could have been prevented
18 of 51
However, What could be argued?
Zimbardo's study was a role plat it lacked external vlidity and hence this might be why the scientific benefits have not been seen in real life
19 of 51
What were the ethical costs to pps under Zimbardo's study?
psychological harm was suffered by pps in the study and one prisoner even went on hunger strike
20 of 51
Perhaps Zimbardo could have forseen what?
the ethical cost to the pp
21 of 51
but what did Cardwell point out?
the study was halted on the 6th day and passed by an ethical committee
22 of 51
If he had stopped the study at the first sign of abuse (day 2) what would have happened?
We would have learnt nothing
23 of 51
What are ethical costs in this study?
essential
24 of 51
However?
psychological studies can be designed to minimise these ethical costs but ultimately could it be argued that what we learn about human behaviour is jepardised when we remove suh costs
25 of 51
What is one way of avoiding ethical costs?
to human pps is to use non human animals in research.
26 of 51
What do researchers who use animals in their studies say?
are ethically justifiable because humans are superior to animes
27 of 51
What does this mean?
It is possible to use animals in research to gain scientific benefits in terms of applications which will ultimately improve the quality of people's lives
28 of 51
For example?
Pavlov's classical confitioning research with dogs has led to cures for bed wetting and alcoholism
29 of 51
What has Seligman's research led to?
Learned helplessness aids understanding of domestic violence and depression
30 of 51
However, animals are not what? and what?
not humans and hence generalisations are tenuous at best
31 of 51
in addition by avoiding the ethical costs to humans, we have not what?
we have not found a better balance just passed on human costs to animals
32 of 51
What would some psychologists sees this as?
specieism
33 of 51
Who are we to say that animals are what?
less important than humans and use them in order to minimise ethical costs to humans
34 of 51
It is clear that there are still ethical costs in regards to what?
animals that are used in research
35 of 51
Why?
they are poorly protected from harm by laws such as the Animals act that only cover limited species and legalise the use of methods
36 of 51
such as what?
electrocution and gassing
37 of 51
Howver, does this matter when what?
we consider the greater good (ultilitarianism)
38 of 51
What is one measurable benefit of research?
success created by treatments
39 of 51
For example?
chemotherapy aims to use anti-depressant drugs to change the chemical or neurotransmitter activity in depressives' brains
40 of 51
What are these examples?
serotonin and noradrenaline
41 of 51
What did Sane find out?
75% success rate for such drugs such as Prozac
42 of 51
If this kind of benefit can be sought perhaps what?
animal and human trials should be essential to imprvoe the lives of many other sufferers (utilitarian view)
43 of 51
However?
what about the remaining 25% who do not respond
44 of 51
Such applications what?
ignore individual differences and do not solve the root cause of the depression, thus making the benefit of such research questionable
45 of 51
What about the ethical costs to human pps during clincial trials of drugs used in therapy?
Even if we assume that using animals can minimise the risks to humans, testing creates an ethical cost at 2 levels
46 of 51
What is the first level?
when the new treatment doesnt work or causes negative side effects meaning the pps are not protected from harm (e.g. tardive dyskinesia
47 of 51
What is the second level?
the problems arising in the placebo group
48 of 51
These pps face deception and what is the inevitable outcome?
that they will not benefit from potentially effective treatments
49 of 51
However what?
would such scientific benefits be possible without such potential ethical costs
50 of 51
What is the answer?
no we have to decide on the lesser of the two evils
51 of 51

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What can this information be?

Back

tested and retested in order to provide soilid evidence which intervention and practical applications can be created

Card 3

Front

What are examples of benefits?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What do specific examples include?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

What is the definition of ethical costs?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Research methods and techniques resources »