Rylands v Fletcher

?
  • Created by: Jamila
  • Created on: 09-04-13 23:39
R v F protects against
an occupier from interefence dur to an isolated escape from the neighbours land.
1 of 16
R v F facts
owner of mines flooded by neighbour land, d liable for the following.
2 of 16
To establish a claim must meet,
D brings unto his land for own purposes something that does mischief, it escapes, represents non natural use, forseeable damage
3 of 16
Type of thing, Hale v Jennings bros
fairy go round, tea cup chair broke loose. liable for this.
4 of 16
Type of thing, LMS International v Styrene packaging
fire in D's land spread to C. Liable had substances on the prop which were pro fire
5 of 16
Type of thing, A-G v Corke
D land occupied by caravan ppl. Held liable for the problems.
6 of 16
if it escapes, Charing cross Electric supply v Hydraulic Power
water mains burst unto their banks. Stat Defence, but held no reason to have the water that high.
7 of 16
if it escapes, Read v Llyod
shell which explodes on the D's prop not held liable for it.
8 of 16
Intentional escape, Rigby v Chief of Northamptonshire
D fired tear gas to get rid of the criminal this was defended by necessity
9 of 16
Intentional escape, Crown river cruises v kimbolton fireworks
D conducted fireworks display, burning debris fell on ship damage. D was liable.
10 of 16
Non Natural use, Richads v lothian
must be shown special use bringing with it danger to others
11 of 16
Non Natural use, Britsih Celanese v Hunt
store had fuelled on the land. held liable although the storage was a normal occurrence.
12 of 16
Non Natural use, Cambridge water v Eastern countries leather
D owned leather org, solvents and chemicals went into soil after years. affect well, not upheld, couldnt forsee the damge.
13 of 16
Forseeable damage, Cambridge/Transco
couldnt forsee the damage. Trans confirmed this ruling.
14 of 16
Who can sue- Transco
Lrd Goff, prop interst
15 of 16
Who can be sued-
person adding to something which later escapes.
16 of 16

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

R v F facts

Back

owner of mines flooded by neighbour land, d liable for the following.

Card 3

Front

To establish a claim must meet,

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Type of thing, Hale v Jennings bros

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Type of thing, LMS International v Styrene packaging

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar All resources:

See all All resources »