Rosenhan alternative evidence 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyCore studiesASWJEC Created by: francesca_321Created on: 02-04-15 19:06 What did Goffman find out? Once labelled insane, the behaviour of mental patients' he observed in an asylum was viewed as a reflection of that label. 1 of 16 How did this evidence support Rosenhan's research? both studies revealed the damaging consequences of being institutionalised and of self fulfilling prophecies 2 of 16 What were patients thought to go through in both studies? 'mortification 3 of 16 What did this mean? Depersonalised and then stripped of their own identities making them powerless 4 of 16 How was Rosenhan's study higher on validity? Rosenhan's posed as an actual patient so he could labelling from a patients viewpoint 5 of 16 compared to Goffman? He only posed as a member of staff 6 of 16 what other study supported Rosenhan's Study? Pygmallion 7 of 16 What did this research find? Special group of pupils showed greater increase in IQ over 8 moths than a control group due o teacher expectations 8 of 16 How does this evidence support Rosenhan? Both studies the pps behaviour was shaped by self fulfilling prophecy 9 of 16 How could one argue that Rosenhan is lower in validity? In pygmalion neitehr teacher not the pupils were aware of the research(double blind) whereas Rosenhan was single blind 10 of 16 What study challenges Rosenhan's study? Slater 11 of 16 What did she say she heard? Thud 12 of 16 What did she find? She was not admitted to the hospitals as schizophrenic and treated well 13 of 16 How did this reject Rosenhan's findings? hearing voices leads to an intermeditate diagnosis of schizophrenia and then to inhumane treatment 14 of 16 How was Rosenhan's research stronger? Slater had one pps whereas Rosenhan had 8 different pps 15 of 16 What was wrong with Slater's project ? It could have led to bias 16 of 16
Comments
No comments have yet been made