More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

If force is used to steal and the theft is complete there is a robbery, which case illustrates this?

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

The prosecution must prove that force was used or threat of force was used. Which case demonstrates this?

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

What case confirmed Dawson and James 1976?

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

Describe a case which shows that a victim does not have to be frightened and that the amout of force does not have to be great?

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

Force or threat of force can be applied to any person, not just the person from whom the theft occurs. Is this true?

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

Force must occur immediately before or at the time of the theft. Is this true?

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

There have been no decided cases on what is classed as immediately before. Is this a problem when taking into account robbery?

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

Deciding when theft is completed is another issue describe the case of Hale in relation to this issue?

Back

Preview of the front of card 13

Card 14

Front

Which case followed the decision in Hale 1979?

Back

Preview of the front of card 14

Card 15

Front

Force must be used for the purpose of theft in order for there to be a robbery. Is this true?

Back

Preview of the front of card 15
View more cards