research methods ; type of experiment 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyResearch methods and techniquesA2/A-levelAQA Created by: ilovetheofficeCreated on: 11-05-18 20:47 LAB EXPERIMENTS DGFG 1 of 51 conducted in what kind env? highly controlled 2 of 51 - strengths dfdg 3 of 51 high control over> extraneous variables 4 of 51 researcher can ther4 ensure any dv change is due to iv 5 of 51 more certain about cause and effect giving hihg? internal validity 6 of 51 what is more possible in this than any other type bc high level cctrl? replication 7 of 51 replication is vital for seeing hwat? whether finding is valid and not just one off 8 of 51 - limitation dgd 9 of 51 lab experiments may lack? generalisability 10 of 51 wht? artificial environment and not like erryday life 11 of 51 in unfamiliar cotext pps behav can't always be generalised outside of research stting giving low? external valiity 12 of 51 pps usually aware being tested which may give rise to? demand characteristics 13 of 51 furthermore tasks don't represent? real life 14 of 51 e.g recalling unconnected words which gives low? mundane realism 15 of 51 FIELD EXPERIMENT DFGD 16 of 51 what happens here? iv manipulated in more natual erryday setting 17 of 51 - strengths dgdfg 18 of 51 env is more natural so higher what than lab? mundane realism 19 of 51 field experiments may produce behaviour thats more? valid + authentic 20 of 51 esp case as pps may be unaware being studied making high? external validity 21 of 51 - limitations dfgdfg 22 of 51 price to pay for increased realism bc lose control of? extraneous variables 23 of 51 means what is more difficult to est? cause and effect 24 of 51 and what about replication? not always precisely possible 25 of 51 also important what kind of issues? ethical 26 of 51 bc if pps unaware being studies they can't do what? consent to being studied 27 of 51 and there4 rsrch may constitute? invasion of privacy 28 of 51 NATURAL EXPERIMENTS DFGD 29 of 51 when researcher does what? takes advantage of pre-existing variable 30 of 51 why natural then? variable would have changed had resaercher been there or not 31 of 51 what is it that's natuarl about this? iv > setting 32 of 51 - strenghts dfgd 33 of 51 provide opportunities for what? resaerch that might not otherwse be undertaken for practical / ethical reasons 34 of 51 why high external validity? study real life issues as happen 35 of 51 - limitations ddfd 36 of 51 naturally occuring event rare, reducing? opps for research 37 of 51 also may limit scope for doing what? generalising findings to other similar situatios 38 of 51 pps may not be randomly allocate dot? experimental condts 39 of 51 meaning researcher might be less sure? whether iv affected dv 40 of 51 QUASI-EXPERIMENTS DGD 41 of 51 what happens here w/ iv? iv base don existing difference between people that just exists 42 of 51 - strengths and limitation dgd 43 of 51 carried out under what kind of conditions? controlled 44 of 51 so share strengths with? lab 45 of 51 and cannot do what with pps? randomly allocate to condts 46 of 51 so thereofre there may be? confounding variables 47 of 51 carried out under what kind of conditions? controlled 48 of 51 so share strengths with? lab 49 of 51 and cannot do what with pps? randomly allocate to condts 50 of 51 so thereofre there may be? confounding variables 51 of 51
Comments
No comments have yet been made