research methods ; peer review + economy 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyResearch methods and techniquesA2/A-levelAQA Created by: ilovetheofficeCreated on: 12-05-18 16:26 PEER REVIEW DGDF 1 of 34 research findings in psych often [ublsihed through? textbooks / conferences / academic journals 2 of 34 before it can become part of journal has to undergo? peer review 3 of 34 this involves allaspects of written investigation being scrutinised by? small groups of usually 2-3 experts in that field 4 of 34 what should these experts be? objective + unknown to author / reatearcher 5 of 34 - main aims dfg 6 of 34 aim 1. to allocate? research funding 7 of 34 before the project to decide? whether or not it should get funding 8 of 34 this may be run by gov run fund orgs who have? vested interest in est which projects are most worthwhile 9 of 34 2. to validate what about research? quality / relevance 10 of 34 all elements assessed for? quality and accuracy 11 of 34 3. to suggest? ammendments / improvements 12 of 34 may suggest minor revisions to do what? improve report 13 of 34 or in extreme circumstances decide? work is inappropriate for publication and withdraw 14 of 34 PEER REVIEW ; EVAL DGDFG 15 of 34 - anonymity dfgdfg 16 of 34 usual practice that peer remains anonymous why? likely produce more honest appraisal 17 of 34 minority use anonymity to do what? criticise rival researchers who they percieve to have wronged them 18 of 34 this is made all the more likely by fact researchers in competition for? funding 19 of 34 for this reason some journals prefer system of? open reviewing 20 of 34 - publication bias dfdg 21 of 34 natural tendency for editors of journals to want to do what? publish headline grabbing findings 22 of 34 to increase what about publication? credibility / circulation 23 of 34 also prefer to publish what kind of results? positive 24 of 34 this could mean what happens to rsrch tht doesnt fit? ignored / disregarded 25 of 34 ultimately creates fale impressoin of what? current state of psychology 26 of 34 - burying ground-breaking rsrch kdfjjfbdf 27 of 34 may suppress opposition to? mainstream theories 28 of 34 why? wish mntn status quo 29 of 34 reviewers tend to be especially critical of resaerch that does what? contradicts own view 30 of 34 who are most likely to be chosen as reviwers? est scientists 31 of 34 as result what kind research more likely to be passed? that chime with current opinion 32 of 34 thus peer review may have effect of slowing? rate of change 33 of 34 IMPLICATIONS ON ECONOMY DFHFG 34 of 34
Comments
No comments have yet been made