Research Methods Inclass test 4

  • Created by: Ezgi_1818
  • Created on: 11-04-18 04:30
When was QR established?
Not new - common in 1900s-1930s
1 of 56
When did the behaviourism and cognitive revolution come about? Quant. approach take over
1970s there was a dominance in quant methods. Emphasis on controlled experiments meant that QR = devalued and viewed with deep suspicion by the scientific community
2 of 56
Since when has QR been accepted as a valuable part of modern society
Since the 1980s = explosion of interest in QR.
3 of 56
What are the main concerns of QR?
Artificiality in research data, ecological validity and 'real world' research
4 of 56
Why has quant methods been critiqued
since 1950's = neglect of common sense reasoning by p's and researchers.
5 of 56
What is QR?
Covers research methodologies which vary in terms of their underlying epistemological assumptions assumptions but share various assumptions.
6 of 56
What concerns does QR share?
Focus on meaning rather than discovering cause-effect; Studying processes rather than predicting outcomes; Studying processes in naturalistic contexts; Understanding p's experiences rather than working w/researchers pre-defined variables
7 of 56
What concerns does QR share?
Verbal/non-verbal data instead of numeric data; Concerned w/construction of categories than than enumeration
8 of 56
What is epistemology?
Historical study of efforts to gain philosophical understanding or knowledge of the nature, origin, methods, limits and scope of human knowledge.
9 of 56
The scientific methods - positivism
Straightforward relationship between the world and our perception and understanding of it. Goal of research = produce objective knowledge
10 of 56
The scientific methods - Empiricism
Knowledge acquisition depends on the collection and analysis of data. Knowledge claims must be grounded in data.
11 of 56
The scientific methods - Hypothetico-deductivism
Karl Popper - no scientific theory could be conclusively verified. Scientific research should rely on dedication + falsification. Putting hypothesis to the test - falsification.
12 of 56
Critique of the 'scientific' method (Willig, 2013)
No space for theory development - reliance on hypotheses generated by existing theories closes off possibility of generating new theories; H-D: Elitist - excludes communities not versed in scientific language/without knowledge of existing theories;
13 of 56
Critique of the 'scientific' method (Willig, 2013)
H-D = myth- when experiment fails, it is the fault of the the researcher not the theory. Knowledge generation = not a piece meal process but develops in leaps of paradigms (Kuhn); feminist critiques e.g. 'The gods eye'
14 of 56
3 Approaches to knowledge production in QR (Willig, 2013)
Realist; Phenomenological and Social constructionist
15 of 56
Realist approach to knowledge production in QR
Wants to generate knowledge which captures and reflects as truthfully as possible what is happening. Assumptions = process of a social/psychological nature which exist and can be identified. Researcher = detective
16 of 56
Phenomenological approach to knowledge production in QR
Aim = produce knowledge about subjective experiences of p's. Interested in qual and texture of experience rather than whether it is an accurate reflection. Researcher = Person-centred counsellor
17 of 56
Social constructionist approach to knowledge production in QR
No direct relationship between perception/experience and objective world. Perception/experiences = historic. cultr. and linguistically specific. Focus on discourses. 'knowledges' rather than knowledge. Researcher = Architect.
18 of 56
Advantages of QR
Flexible approach - suitable for many naturally occurring settings; Useful in clinical work + researching settings; collect rich + descriptive data from ppl own accounts; explore accounts of both individuals + groups; focus on meanings;
19 of 56
Advantages of QR
can research sensitive/unusual areas; can be used alone to interpret, quantify/illuminate statistical analysis
20 of 56
Disadvantages of QR
Very time consuming and labour intensive - expensive; open to subjective interpretation; results in huge amounts of data - needing skilled analysis by experienced researchers; Q's abt reliability of data - generalisable?
21 of 56
What methods do Q researchers use?
Interviews; Observations; Focus groups; Diaries; Online data
22 of 56
Popular - often semi-structured, can be structured/open; Individual/pair/triads; Useful for sensitive topics
23 of 56
Observational data in naturally occurring settings; Opportunity to record/analyse behaviour and interactions as they occur; useful in research involving several players; work on non-verbal communication and consequences of events.
24 of 56
Focus groups
Recent method of data collection - gaining popularity; Group int. - using interaction amongst p's as a source of data; Explore+show people think/talk about a topic.
25 of 56
p's maintain a record over extended time; written/tape recorded; relatively unstructured; researcher may offer some advice
26 of 56
Online data
Material from discussion boards; social media; poss to conduct int + focus groups online e.g. via IM/email
27 of 56
Objective reality =measurable; experiences + perceptions map out onto what is 'out there'; Researcher = detective; Knowledge = value free (objective)
28 of 56
Social constructionism
No direct relationship between perception/experience and 'objective' world; mediated by history, culture, language etc; multiple interpretation = 'knowledges'; researcher = architect - focus on discourses (study of sociallife thru analysis of lang)
29 of 56
Within QR, diff methods of analysing Q data, and they incl:
Subscribe to diff epistemological positions; Occupy diff positions on realism --> social constructionism continuum.
30 of 56
What does the method of QR used depend on?
the assumptions and values of the researcher as well as the research question
31 of 56
Explore in detail individual, personal and lived experiences and to examine how p's are making sense of their personal and social world
32 of 56
IPA focus
Lived experience and people's making sense of these experiences; issues of interest = identity, self, bodily experiences; small, homogenous sample.
33 of 56
Role of researcher in IPA
Dynamic research process + active role of the researcher --> Double, empathetic and critical hermeneutics. Idiographic = case study the unit of analysis.
34 of 56
Process of IPA
1) Identify themes in the first case 2) Identify theme clusters 3) Create a table of master themes 4) Continue w/other cases, looking for ev. of thematic structure but also ready for new themes 5) Cyclical process 6) Write up - themes --> narrative
35 of 56
GT - Glaser and Strauss (1967)
'Discovering' theory from examination of data; talk represents the content of ppl's minds and provides direct access to thoughts/emotions. Most positivist of methods of q analysis.
36 of 56
When is GT used?
Relatively little known about topic/no grand explanatory theory; develop new theories/challenge existing ones; to see p's understandings, perceptions + experiences of the world
37 of 56
Process of GT
1) Coding + generation of categories (progressively more analytic, In-vivo labels) 2) constant comparative analysis 3) negative case analysis 4) theoretical sensitivity 5) theoretical saturation 6) memoing
38 of 56
Method for identifying, analysing and reporting themes within data. It minimally organises and describes your data set in rich detail.
39 of 56
Characteristics of TA
Increasingly popular; appropriate for analysing any sort of Q data; not as prescriptive as other methods; flexible - can be combined w/diff epistemological positions; Involves searching across data set to find themes;
40 of 56
Characteristics of TA part 2
Analysis can be Inductive/deductive; themes can be analysed at semantic/latent level
41 of 56
TA - Braun & Clarke - 6 steps
1) Familiarising yourself w/data 2) Generalising initial codes 3) Searching for themes 4) Reviewing themes 5) Defining and naming themes 6) Producing the report
42 of 56
Discourse Analysis - Social constructionist position
No objective reality out there which we can measure; language doesn't provide access to ppls psychological and social worlds; 2 diff. approaches to discourse analysis.
43 of 56
2 different approaches to discourse analysis
Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis ('top-down') and Discursive psychology ('bottom-up')
44 of 56
More than a methodology
Identification of discourses/linguistic repertoires - 'discourse' a systematic, coherent set of images, metaphors etc. that construct an object in a particular way; Language = constructive + functional = action orientated
45 of 56
Data collection
Naturally occurring talk and text where poss; ethical considerations - often semi-structured int/focus groups; transcription often very laborious in discourse analyses.
46 of 56
How to evaluate Q research?
Validity and reliability = irrelevant/imposs concepts to apply to QR --> rest on the assumption of the researchers objectivity; Quant R aims to remove bias,BUT QR = researcher actively involv. in process thus remove bias = inappropriate + misguided
47 of 56
General Guidelines for evaluating QR
Rigour + Transparency; Providing context (situating the research + reflexivity (researchers awareness of analytic focus on their relationship to the field of study)); Importance/relevance
48 of 56
Yardley (2000)
Sensitivity to context; Commitment + Rigour; Transparency + Coherence; Impact+Importance
49 of 56
Henwood & Pidgeon (1992) - Informed by GT
Importance of fit; Integration of theory; Reflexivity; Documentation; Theoretical sampling & negative case analysis; sensitivity to negotiated realities; transferability
50 of 56
Elliott et al. (1999) - Informed by phenomenological perspective
Owning one's perspective; situating the sample; grounding in examples; providing credibility checks; coherence; accomplishing general vs. specific research tasks; resonating w/readers
51 of 56
Problems w/general evaluative criteria for QR - Methods have diff assumptions in terms of:
1) Nature of the world 2) The meaning of knowledge 3) The role of the researcher in the research process (Willig, 2008)
52 of 56
Madill et al. (2000) - approaches to QR
1) Naive realist - characterised by a 'discovery' orientation --> objectivity + reality 2) Contextual constructionist - knowledge = contextual --> reflexivity 3) Radical constructionist = knowledge = social construction
53 of 56
Criteria for specific methods in QR - GR
Aim = develop theory inductively from the data; need to demonstrate that methods of data collection + the analytic processes captured the 'real' experiences + meanings of the p's - transparency, going back to p's to check val., using triangulation
54 of 56
Criteria for specific methods in QR - Phenomenological (e.g. IPA)
Concerned w/detailed description rather than explanation. Evaluated by demonstrating Rigour + Reflexivity rather than explanation adequacy of the research to access the real experiences of the p's.
55 of 56
Criteria for specific methods in QR - Discourse Analysis
Concerned w/how lang. constructs particular objects + phenomena; often aims to challenge the 'taken-for-granted'; so need to ensure Quality + Rigour of analysis - not whether analysis reflects anything 'real/out there'
56 of 56

Other cards in this set

Card 2


1970s there was a dominance in quant methods. Emphasis on controlled experiments meant that QR = devalued and viewed with deep suspicion by the scientific community


When did the behaviourism and cognitive revolution come about? Quant. approach take over

Card 3


Since the 1980s = explosion of interest in QR.


Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4


Artificiality in research data, ecological validity and 'real world' research


Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5


since 1950's = neglect of common sense reasoning by p's and researchers.


Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Research Methods resources »